[gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[de Almeida, Valmor F.]

Hello,

The emerge of lapack-reference does not consider gfortran

^[[31;01m*^[[0m None of the needed Fortran Compilers (g77 ifc) is
installed.
 ^[[31;01m*^[[0m To install one of these, choose one of the following
steps:
 ^[[31;01m*^[[0m [1] USE="fortran" emerge =sys-devel/gcc-3*
 ^[[31;01m*^[[0m [2] emerge dev-lang/ifc

!!! ERROR: sci-libs/lapack-reference-3.0-r1 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1630:   Called dyn_setup
  ebuild.sh, line 702:   Called qa_call 'pkg_setup'
  ebuild.sh, line 38:   Called pkg_setup
  ebuild.sh, line 1304:   Called fortran_pkg_setup
  fortran.eclass, line 181:   Called need_fortran 'g77' 'ifc'
  fortran.eclass, line 109:   Called die

!!! Install a Fortran Compiler !
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
stack if relevant.
!!! A complete build log is located at
'/var/log/portage/sci-libs:lapack-reference-3.0-r1:20070320-144521.log'.


There is a bug 

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146448

for the lapack-3.0 ebuild a bit old but none for the lapack-reference.

Anyway to circumvent this problem in the 2006.1 profile? I tried
creating a g77 symlink to gfortran but the loader calls for libg2c which
I don't have. 

Thanks,


--
Valmor



--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[Donnie Berkholz]

de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The emerge of lapack-reference does not consider gfortran
> 
> ^[[31;01m*^[[0m None of the needed Fortran Compilers (g77 ifc) is
> installed.
>  ^[[31;01m*^[[0m To install one of these, choose one of the following
> steps:
>  ^[[31;01m*^[[0m [1] USE="fortran" emerge =sys-devel/gcc-3*
>  ^[[31;01m*^[[0m [2] emerge dev-lang/ifc
> 
> !!! ERROR: sci-libs/lapack-reference-3.0-r1 failed.

You need to use a newer revision in the 3.0 series.

$ grep gfort /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.*
/usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-r3.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 
gfortran ifc"
/usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-r4.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 
gfortran ifc"
/usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.1.0.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 
gfortran ifc"

You probably missed that because no stable version works with gfortran 
and the only 3.0 versions that do were removed (obsolete, Markus? -- I 
wanted to mark those stable).

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[Markus Dittrich]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:

> de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
>>  Hello,
>>
>>  The emerge of lapack-reference does not consider gfortran
>>
>>  ^[[31;01m*^[[0m None of the needed Fortran Compilers (g77 ifc)
>>  is
>>  installed.
>>  ^[[31;01m*^[[0m To install one of these, choose one of the
>>  following
>>  steps:
>> ^ [[31;01m*^[[0m [1] USE="fortran" emerge =sys-devel/gcc-3*
>> ^ [[31;01m*^[[0m [2] emerge dev-lang/ifc
>>
>>  !!! ERROR: sci-libs/lapack-reference-3.0-r1 failed.
>
> You need to use a newer revision in the 3.0 series.
>
> $ grep gfort 
> /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.*
> /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-r3.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 
> gfortran ifc"
> /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-r4.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 
> gfortran ifc"
> /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.1.0.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 
> gfortran ifc"
>
> You probably missed that because no stable version works with 
> gfortran and the only 3.0 versions that do were removed (obsolete, 
> Markus? -- I wanted to mark those stable).
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie

Hi Donnie,

I was planning on marking the 3.1 series stable and sorry
for removing these old versions under your feet. If 3.1.0
would be fine with you I'll file the stabilization bug
for it later today. It works fine for me and all tests
pass on my dev boxes.

cheers,
Markus



- -- 
Markus Dittrich (markusle)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Scientific applications
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGACdXxlRwCwb7k40RArJmAJ91g4sEJvfDkOZJXJBvfLeA+UoF+QCfXPy8
qE/4pjbX+zi3FxSsbRnGV2g=
=G28h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[Bob Slawson]

de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:

------(snip)-----
> 
> !!! Install a Fortran Compiler !
> !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
> stack if relevant.
> !!! A complete build log is located at
> '/var/log/portage/sci-libs:lapack-reference-3.0-r1:20070320-144521.log'.
> 
> 
> There is a bug 
> 
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146448
> 
> for the lapack-3.0 ebuild a bit old but none for the lapack-reference.
> 
> Anyway to circumvent this problem in the 2006.1 profile? I tried
> creating a g77 symlink to gfortran but the loader calls for libg2c which
> I don't have. 

g77 is part of gcc-3 (gcc-3.4.6 is latest).  You can have both gcc-3 and 
gcc-4 installed at the same time and switch between them using 
`gcc-config' as needed.

BobS
-- 
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[de Almeida, Valmor F.]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donnie Berkholz [mailto:dberkholz@gentoo.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 2:06 PM
> To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not
> lapack-reference
> 
> de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> > ------snip--------
> 
> You need to use a newer revision in the 3.0 series.
> 
> $ grep gfort
/usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.*
> /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-
> r3.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77
> gfortran ifc"
> /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-
> r4.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77
> gfortran ifc"
> /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-
> 3.1.0.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77
> gfortran ifc"
> 
> You probably missed that because no stable version works with gfortran
> and the only 3.0 versions that do were removed (obsolete, Markus? -- I
> wanted to mark those stable).

I only have 3.1.* ebuilds

->grep gfort /usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.*
/usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.1.0.ebuild:FOR
TRAN="g77 gfortran ifc"
/usr/portage/sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.1.1.ebuild:FOR
TRAN="g77 gfortran ifc"

But in my portage tree the only available version is

*  sci-libs/lapack-reference
      Latest version available: 3.0-r1
      Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
      Size of files: 4,934 kB
      Homepage:      http://www.netlib.org/lapack/index.html
      Description:   FORTRAN reference implementation of LAPACK Linear
Algebra PACKage
      License:       lapack

Does this mean I have to emerge a masked package?

Thanks,

--
Valmor




> 
> Thanks,
> Donnie
> --
> gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[Honza Macháček]

de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:

> But in my portage tree the only available version is
> ...
> 
> Does this mean I have to emerge a masked package?

  Just an unstable one.

echo "sci-libs/blas-atlas ~x86" >>/etc/portage/package.keywords
echo "sci-libs/lapack-atlas ~x86" >>/etc/portage/package.keywords
echo "sci-libs/lapack-reference ~x86" >>/etc/portage/package.keywords

(If your Xeons are 64-bit and you compile 64-bit system, you should
probably use ~amd64 instead of ~x86.)

  With best regards
					Honza Macháček
-- 
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[de Almeida, Valmor F.]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Honza Macháček [mailto:Hloupy.Honza@centrum.cz]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:06 PM
> To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not
> lapack-reference
> 
> de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> 
> > But in my portage tree the only available version is
> > ...
> >
> > Does this mean I have to emerge a masked package?
> 
>   Just an unstable one.
> 
> echo "sci-libs/blas-atlas ~x86" >>/etc/portage/package.keywords
> echo "sci-libs/lapack-atlas ~x86" >>/etc/portage/package.keywords
> echo "sci-libs/lapack-reference ~x86" >>/etc/portage/package.keywords

That is what I did (just lapack-reference) and it did emerge.

Thanks,

--
Valmor
> 
> (If your Xeons are 64-bit and you compile 64-bit system, you should
> probably use ~amd64 instead of ~x86.)
> 
>   With best regards
> 					Honza Macháček
> --
> gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-science] gfortran used for blas-reference but not lapack-reference

[Donnie Berkholz]

Markus Dittrich wrote:
> I was planning on marking the 3.1 series stable and sorry
> for removing these old versions under your feet. If 3.1.0
> would be fine with you I'll file the stabilization bug
> for it later today. It works fine for me and all tests
> pass on my dev boxes.

Fine by me -- we just need something stable that works with gcc4.

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list