From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HOM7O-0001j1-LG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:57:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l25Mudi0021610; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:56:39 GMT Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l25MucGh021605 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:56:39 GMT Received: from [12.76.160.4] (4.cambridge-41-44ev.ma.dial-access.att.net[12.76.160.4]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with ESMTP id <20070305225636112003rpdee>; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:56:36 +0000 Message-ID: <45ECA025.1080503@att.net> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:56:37 -0500 From: Bill Dandreta User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070227) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Cblas, Numpy, Scipy References: <45E43D13.1020202@att.net> <45E44287.8090408@gentoo.org> <45E4CB12.9090805@att.net> <45E5620D.4020600@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <45E5620D.4020600@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l25MudiN021610 X-Archives-Salt: c64341fd-5dc4-41c6-af4a-674ee15a638e X-Archives-Hash: cfc390c250ea86655088f18fbeec556d S=E9bastien Fabbro wrote: >> gcc -shared .libs/libatlas.la-3.o -lpthread >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/32/libgfortran.so -Wl,-soname >> -Wl,libatlas.so.0 -o .libs/libatlas.so.0.0.0 >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/32/libgfortran.so: could not re= ad >> symbols: File in wrong format >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> libtool: install: `libatlas.la' is not a valid libtool archive >> =20 > > > I can't reproduce your failing blas-atlas (which should be at least > blas-atlas-3.7.11-r1 for numpy-1.0.1-r1). It looks it mixes 32 and 64 > profiles. > If it persists, once again, please file a bug regarding blas-atlas on > bugs.gentoo.org. > > S=E9bastien > =20 Hi S=E9bastien, I ran revdep-rebuild and emerged glibc and gcc than blas-atlas compiled O= K. Bill --=20 gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list