public inbox for gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@cesmail.net>
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack 3.0?
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:38:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45E22C1F.8040805@cesmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702251718.21765.gentoo@matthewlee.org>

Matthew R. Lee wrote:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 18:50, Patrice Beaud wrote:
>   
>> Matthew R. Lee a écrit :
>>     
>>> I've just installed the science overlay because I want to use rkward
>>> However when I try "emerge -pv rkward" it tells me there are no ebuilds
>>> to satisfy ">=sci-libs/lapack-3.0"
>>> This is the first time I've used an overlay, so is this a bug in the
>>> ebuild of rkward or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>       
>> It seems like the ebuild is outdated... (Note: I didn't know however
>> RKward existed. Thank you!)
>>
>>  I make a:
>> cp -a /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/rkward/
>> /usr/local/portage/sci-mathematics/
>>
>> Change the name of the ebuild from rkward-0.3.7_pre1.ebuild to
>> rkward-0.4.6.ebuild.
>>
>>
>> Modify the ebuild:
>>
>> 10c10
>> < SRC_URI="http://rkward.sourceforge.net/temp/rkward-0.3.7pre1.tar.gz"
>> ---
>>
>>  > SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz"
>>
>> 17c17
>> < DEPEND=">=sci-libs/lapack-3.0
>> ---
>>
>>  > DEPEND=">=virtual/lapack-3.0
>>
>> 27c27
>> <       mv rkward-0.3.7pre1 rkward-0.3.7_pre1 || die
>> ---
>>
>>  > #     mv rkward-0.3.7pre1 rkward-0.3.7_pre1 || die
>>
>> run
>> ebuild /usr/local/portage/sci-mathematics/rkward/rkward-0.4.6.ebuild digest
>>
>>
>> I started emerging and it stops with a sandbox violation:
>> --------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
>> ---------------------------
>> LOG FILE =
>> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-sci-mathematics_-_rkward-0.4.6-14654.log"
>>
>> open_wr:   /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
>> open_wr:   /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----
>>
>> I continue without sandbox... :-(
>> RKward was installed and it works.
>>
>>
>> Thank you (I can try R) and Good luck !
>>    Patrice
>>     
>
> Patrice,
> Thanks for the help.  I made some modifications to the ebuild and I too now 
> have rkward-0.4.6 running.  I didn't encounter the same problem with the sand 
> box, which is just as well as I don't know how to run an ebuild without the 
> sandbox :-)
> Given that this ebuild is a. out of date, and b. doesn't work.  Is there 
> anyone maintaining it?  I would volunteer, but I have zero experience of 
> putting ebuilds together.  If someone who knows what they are doing was 
> available on the end of the email to answer my (bleedin' obvious questions, 
> I'm just a marine ecologist :-)) I'd give it a go.  I'd like to learn how to 
> create ebuilds as there are other packages in addition to rkward that I'd 
> like to see in the tree, like xtides
>
> Matt 
>   
I'm a little curious about something ... does "rkward" actually require 
an external Lapack, or is this optional? The reason I ask is that R 
itself *contains* a copy of Lapack, and the R developers have deprecated 
linking against external Lapack libraries!

-- 
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P)
http://borasky-research.blogspot.com/

If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits fire.

-- 
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-26  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-24 13:07 [gentoo-science] lapack 3.0? Matthew R. Lee
2007-02-24 21:50 ` Patrice Beaud
2007-02-25 20:18   ` Matthew R. Lee
2007-02-26  0:38     ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [this message]
2007-02-26 13:09       ` Matthew R. Lee
2007-02-27  8:12       ` [gentoo-science] lapack 3.0? (rkward) Honza Macháček
2007-02-27 15:17         ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45E22C1F.8040805@cesmail.net \
    --to=znmeb@cesmail.net \
    --cc=gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox