* [gentoo-science] Dropping sci-libs/{blas,lapack,atlas}
@ 2006-10-06 3:14 Donnie Berkholz
2006-10-06 13:28 ` Markus Dittrich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2006-10-06 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 271 bytes --]
Now that amd64's finally marked an mpqc stable that doesn't use the old
blas/lapack setup, I think we can finally drop it from the tree and
completely move to the new setup:
{blas,cblas,lapack}-reference
{blas,lapack}-atlas
Any objections?
Thanks,
Donnie
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-science] Dropping sci-libs/{blas,lapack,atlas}
2006-10-06 3:14 [gentoo-science] Dropping sci-libs/{blas,lapack,atlas} Donnie Berkholz
@ 2006-10-06 13:28 ` Markus Dittrich
2006-10-06 13:46 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Dittrich @ 2006-10-06 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Now that amd64's finally marked an mpqc stable that doesn't use the old
> blas/lapack setup, I think we can finally drop it from the tree and
> completely move to the new setup:
>
> {blas,cblas,lapack}-reference
> {blas,lapack}-atlas
>
> Any objections?
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
>
I am all for it:)
Thanks,
Markus
- --
Markus Dittrich (markusle)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Scientific applications
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFJln8xlRwCwb7k40RAuD2AJ4xrgBKJBq8S30C7r0nfJkbgFi0GgCfc1Yj
u17QUOjPhD28G/NwlQwcZ+I=
=ZF/e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-science] Dropping sci-libs/{blas,lapack,atlas}
2006-10-06 13:28 ` Markus Dittrich
@ 2006-10-06 13:46 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky @ 2006-10-06 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Markus Dittrich wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>> Now that amd64's finally marked an mpqc stable that doesn't use the old
>> blas/lapack setup, I think we can finally drop it from the tree and
>> completely move to the new setup:
>
>> {blas,cblas,lapack}-reference
>> {blas,lapack}-atlas
>
>> Any objections?
>
>> Thanks,
>> Donnie
>
>
> I am all for it:)
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
>
>
> -- Markus Dittrich (markusle)
> Gentoo Linux Developer
> Scientific applications
Go for it!!
By the way, what ever happened with the attempted contribution of the
Gentoo shared library patch to the Atlas community?
--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-06 13:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-06 3:14 [gentoo-science] Dropping sci-libs/{blas,lapack,atlas} Donnie Berkholz
2006-10-06 13:28 ` Markus Dittrich
2006-10-06 13:46 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox