From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F83oT-0004Lu-N3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:05:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1BN5FMq029799; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:05:15 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1BN5E4J030781 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:05:15 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1F83nm-0003Sj-Ev for gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:05:14 +0000 Message-ID: <43EE6D2D.2030101@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:03:09 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060208) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Fortran90 codes References: <20060211141514.47928.qmail@web50207.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060211141514.47928.qmail@web50207.mail.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF98CDE1EF115379D9194C00E" X-Archives-Salt: e4eb5fb1-4252-4236-8c22-f4e80db8afa5 X-Archives-Hash: 57d1a0270b33c04a9ba3197b000f3194 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF98CDE1EF115379D9194C00E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable M.R. Francis wrote: > 1) I have successfully installed the g95 compiler (no ebuild), and onc= e > configured properly, emerge does end up using it. I installed Octave, > and autoconfig found and apparently used g95. Might that be a good, > free (as in speech) alternative to ifc? > 2) Does anyone know what the status is for gcc-4, with support for > Fortran 90/95? The gfortran in portage gcc-4.1 snapshots is quite capable although still missing some features compared to g77 [1]. The gfortran in gcc-4.0 is still reasonable. > I'm not using Fortran much these days, but I can give a shot at writing= > an ebuild for g95 and submit a bug. It certainly wouldn't hurt to also have a g95 ebuild, as they do have different capabilities. Thanks, Donnie 1. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D19292 --------------enigF98CDE1EF115379D9194C00E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD7m0tXVaO67S1rtsRAhc+AKDNLGfxY1S+5fhuzu3Ej40yTuF8nACbB0DF 0Ox4ZPP6bedNmOVOiT/j0/g= =9SvD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF98CDE1EF115379D9194C00E-- -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list