From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1F3SeN-0002FT-A0
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:36:31 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0U6ZpmJ007551;
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:35:51 GMT
Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0U6ZoS2018966
for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:35:51 GMT
Received: from [24.21.55.62] (c-24-21-55-62.hsd1.or.comcast.net[24.21.55.62])
by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP
id <2006013006354901400g9bsne>; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:35:49 +0000
Message-ID: <43DDB3C2.7060206@cesmail.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:35:46 -0800
From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@cesmail.net>
User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060112)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-science+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-science.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] New category proposal - sci-vis
References: <200511272053.49014.cryos@gentoo.org> <438A52BE.6030703@cesmail.net> <200601292116.42688.cryos@gentoo.org> <43DD3E86.9090206@gentoo.org> <Pine.LNX.4.56L0.0601300219230.27126@toucan.gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56L0.0601300219230.27126@toucan.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: b53b7f88-affe-44f8-a9e3-59830ed6fd98
X-Archives-Hash: 69c25cbd0ef15a301edc6732f0526957
Apparently it's more than a "proposal" ... tonight's "emerge --sync"
moved some packages, breaking some ebuilds in the process. I haven't dug
into it enough to file a bug yet, though.
Markus Dittrich wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>> Now the question is, can we put less general-purpose visualization
>> programs there? For example, molecular graphics programs.
>>
>>
>
> I would tend to say yes, since molecular graphics programs can vizualize
> everything from small molecules to large biomolecular systems.
> Hence, I would have a hard time deciding if, e.g. VMD should
> be sci-biology or sci-chemistry, whereas sci-visualization seems
> natural. I would really like to hear opinions before I commit
> VMD to portage.
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
>
>
> - --
> Markus Dittrich (markusle)
> Gentoo Linux Developer
> Scientific applications
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFD3XoexlRwCwb7k40RAsShAJ9LCa/KwEGKf/PVHs/vUn0m/yC3WACfSkCc
> qPKdDYNN1IUazka2mD7s61I=
> =nF+q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list