From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F3SeN-0002FT-A0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:36:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0U6ZpmJ007551; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:35:51 GMT Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0U6ZoS2018966 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:35:51 GMT Received: from [24.21.55.62] (c-24-21-55-62.hsd1.or.comcast.net[24.21.55.62]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006013006354901400g9bsne>; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:35:49 +0000 Message-ID: <43DDB3C2.7060206@cesmail.net> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:35:46 -0800 From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060112) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] New category proposal - sci-vis References: <200511272053.49014.cryos@gentoo.org> <438A52BE.6030703@cesmail.net> <200601292116.42688.cryos@gentoo.org> <43DD3E86.9090206@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b53b7f88-affe-44f8-a9e3-59830ed6fd98 X-Archives-Hash: 69c25cbd0ef15a301edc6732f0526957 Apparently it's more than a "proposal" ... tonight's "emerge --sync" moved some packages, breaking some ebuilds in the process. I haven't dug into it enough to file a bug yet, though. Markus Dittrich wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > >> Now the question is, can we put less general-purpose visualization >> programs there? For example, molecular graphics programs. >> >> > > I would tend to say yes, since molecular graphics programs can vizualize > everything from small molecules to large biomolecular systems. > Hence, I would have a hard time deciding if, e.g. VMD should > be sci-biology or sci-chemistry, whereas sci-visualization seems > natural. I would really like to hear opinions before I commit > VMD to portage. > > Thanks, > Markus > > > > - -- > Markus Dittrich (markusle) > Gentoo Linux Developer > Scientific applications > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFD3XoexlRwCwb7k40RAsShAJ9LCa/KwEGKf/PVHs/vUn0m/yC3WACfSkCc > qPKdDYNN1IUazka2mD7s61I= > =nF+q > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky http://linuxcapacityplanning.com -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list