From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@cesmail.net>
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] New category proposal - sci-vis
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:35:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43DDB3C2.7060206@cesmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56L0.0601300219230.27126@toucan.gentoo.org>
Apparently it's more than a "proposal" ... tonight's "emerge --sync"
moved some packages, breaking some ebuilds in the process. I haven't dug
into it enough to file a bug yet, though.
Markus Dittrich wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>> Now the question is, can we put less general-purpose visualization
>> programs there? For example, molecular graphics programs.
>>
>>
>
> I would tend to say yes, since molecular graphics programs can vizualize
> everything from small molecules to large biomolecular systems.
> Hence, I would have a hard time deciding if, e.g. VMD should
> be sci-biology or sci-chemistry, whereas sci-visualization seems
> natural. I would really like to hear opinions before I commit
> VMD to portage.
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
>
>
> - --
> Markus Dittrich (markusle)
> Gentoo Linux Developer
> Scientific applications
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFD3XoexlRwCwb7k40RAsShAJ9LCa/KwEGKf/PVHs/vUn0m/yC3WACfSkCc
> qPKdDYNN1IUazka2mD7s61I=
> =nF+q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-30 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-27 20:53 [gentoo-science] New category proposal - sci-vis Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-11-27 21:40 ` Olivier Fisette
2005-11-27 21:51 ` Holger Peters
2005-11-27 22:05 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-11-27 22:11 ` [gentoo-science] " George Shapovalov
2005-11-27 23:05 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-11-28 0:12 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-27 22:47 ` Markus Dittrich
2005-11-27 23:00 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-11-28 0:05 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-28 1:01 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-11-28 5:36 ` Markus Dittrich
2005-11-28 5:40 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-28 0:43 ` [gentoo-science] " M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2006-01-29 21:16 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2006-01-29 22:15 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-01-29 22:23 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2006-01-29 22:41 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2006-01-30 2:29 ` Markus Dittrich
2006-01-30 6:35 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [this message]
2006-01-30 8:38 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2006-01-30 14:51 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2006-01-30 21:21 ` Olivier Fisette
2006-01-30 22:26 ` Markus Dittrich
2006-01-29 22:53 ` jak
2006-01-30 8:59 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43DDB3C2.7060206@cesmail.net \
--to=znmeb@cesmail.net \
--cc=gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox