From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
To: Markus Dittrich <markusle@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org, sci@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-science] Re: New category proposal - sci-vis
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:05:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <438A49AE.6020203@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56L0.0511272236450.23997@toucan.gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Markus Dittrich wrote:
| Depending on the "definition" of visualisation and hence sci-vis
| this category could also include
|
| sci-chemistry/pymol
|
| and possibly
|
| sci-chemistry/molden
|
| since both visualize molecules. Particularly pymol doesn't
| seem to really fit in sci-chemistry since it is geared toward
| biomolecules and could as well be in sci-biology. The same
| will hold for vmd once I am done with the ebuild.
Macromolecular graphics tools I really consider biochemistry, so they
can go either way. But I more often hear biochemistry elongated as
biological chemistry than chemical biology. So if forced to categorize
one or the other, I lean toward chemistry.
Thanks,
Donnie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDikmuXVaO67S1rtsRArP7AKDBhr9SZfZN03pyyZNNW4k8akM4MACgqSaq
hg5DcWIvU/s3reI3D283do0=
=fNqz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-28 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-27 20:53 [gentoo-science] New category proposal - sci-vis Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-11-27 21:40 ` Olivier Fisette
2005-11-27 21:51 ` Holger Peters
2005-11-27 22:05 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-11-27 22:11 ` [gentoo-science] " George Shapovalov
2005-11-27 23:05 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-11-28 0:12 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-27 22:47 ` Markus Dittrich
2005-11-27 23:00 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-11-28 0:05 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2005-11-28 1:01 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-11-28 5:36 ` Markus Dittrich
2005-11-28 5:40 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-28 0:43 ` [gentoo-science] " M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2006-01-29 21:16 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2006-01-29 22:15 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-01-29 22:23 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2006-01-29 22:41 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2006-01-30 2:29 ` Markus Dittrich
2006-01-30 6:35 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2006-01-30 8:38 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2006-01-30 14:51 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2006-01-30 21:21 ` Olivier Fisette
2006-01-30 22:26 ` Markus Dittrich
2006-01-29 22:53 ` jak
2006-01-30 8:59 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=438A49AE.6020203@gentoo.org \
--to=spyderous@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=markusle@gentoo.org \
--cc=sci@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox