From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcaJR-0007ng-OT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:19:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAH3IiY2031267; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:18:44 GMT Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAH3IhaA024214 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:18:44 GMT Received: from [67.169.201.4] (c-67-169-201-4.hsd1.or.comcast.net[67.169.201.4]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20051117031842012002bsfbe>; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:18:42 +0000 Message-ID: <437BF68A.5080009@cesmail.net> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:18:34 -0800 From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] MPICH depends on X11? References: <58ad514b0511161124k380e32eey49737db8a9246525@mail.gmail.com> <437B8EF2.9030901@gentoo.org> <437BA507.70404@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <437BA507.70404@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e99e8ac6-264c-441e-97a4-91e3ad6bb5a1 X-Archives-Hash: dfac7cbf164649b549a2c392c5a0903a There are some other miscellaneous lam-mpi / mpich dependencies/conflicts/gotchas in Portage; you probably won't see them unless you're using ~x86 and trying to load the R packages that use them. When I get some free time I'll document everything in Bugzilla. Meanwhile, speaking of R, they are at R-2.2.0 and counting -- 2.3 should be out in the spring. Portage appears to be stuck at R-2.1.1. Is there any reason there hasn't been an R version bump? Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Philippe Trottier wrote: > | I have stooped using mpich and started use lam-mpi take a look at > that ? > > That's ironic, because the lam-mpi team has stopped developing lam-mpi > and now works on openmpi [1], along with a number of other groups. =) > > As far as moving into the future for MPI in Gentoo goes, there's an > mpich2 ebuild in progress, and we'll probably start working on an > openmpi ebuild once they have a 1.0 release. > > Thanks, > Donnie > > 1. http://www.open-mpi.org/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFDe6UHXVaO67S1rtsRAiPdAKD/G/r7DHRXymnwsoqnBzLr5xjNdgCgl7Et > WskpoCWoUJpddnTsm4bI2e4= > =/vLx > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky http://linuxcapacityplanning.com -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list