From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E6sH6-0007ge-3m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:02:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7LG0LkD023272; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:00:21 GMT Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7LG0KX0014611 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:00:20 GMT Received: from [67.169.201.4] (c-67-169-201-4.hsd1.or.comcast.net[67.169.201.4]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005082116004401300l5ubbe>; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:00:44 +0000 Message-ID: <4308A528.5090608@cesmail.net> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:00:40 -0700 From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050812) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition References: <200508211343.48047.pbienst@gentoo.org> <43089EBD.3070400@cesmail.net> <200508211751.38733.pbienst@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200508211751.38733.pbienst@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6d5ad612-7986-4f4f-be0e-55edfd02b8a3 X-Archives-Hash: b09e3b509070dbe5449d35e3ca175058 I just got an email from Clint Whaley on the Atlas mailing list. He's sent out 3.7.11 with bugfixes. Given the re-org, should I post a request for 3.7.11 on bugzilla? When is the re-org going to happen? Peter Bienstman wrote: >On Sunday 21 August 2005 17:33, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > > >>I just returned to this list -- what is the "new infrastructure" we are >>"preparing for"? >> >> > >The ability to switch between different lapack implementations (reference, >ATLAS, later perhaps MKL) at run time. > > > >>Could we get a "testing/unstable" Atlas in Portage? Right now, they are >>at 3.7.10, and I only see a 3.7.10 for blas-atlas, not for atlas itself >>or lapack-atlas. I think the x86-64 users will want 3.7.10 across the >>board, and might also want to be able to compile selected code with GCC 4. >> >> > >That's also on the TODO list. > >Peter > > -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list