* [gentoo-science] science overlay vs. main tree
@ 2013-07-28 19:25 Thomas Kahle
2013-07-29 11:45 ` George Shapovalov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Kahle @ 2013-07-28 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 702 bytes --]
Hi,
what are our current heuristics to decide if a package goes into main
tree or stays in the science overlay? Two years ago I spent a lot of
time to get my beloved Macaulay2 tree ready and we even had a stable
version (getting old now). Stabilising a new version is blocked among
other things because the build system does not respect a custom AR (bug
474784) and RANLIB (bug 474788). Even if its not too hard, I'm not
going to fix those. This would be just ridiculous. I probably know all
the users of Macaulay2 on Gentoo personally. None of them want to use a
different ar. So, should I treeclean M2 and move it back to overlay
only?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 381 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] science overlay vs. main tree
2013-07-28 19:25 [gentoo-science] science overlay vs. main tree Thomas Kahle
@ 2013-07-29 11:45 ` George Shapovalov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: George Shapovalov @ 2013-07-29 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Hi Thomas,
Usually, our main "requirement" was presence of the active maintainer. As you
are, apparently, its maintainer, I say all the decisions are up to you ;). Can
you keep the old version in the tree (it is not broken after all, as I
gather?) and provide a new one in the overlay for a time being? May be the
upstream will come to its senses and you will be able to reintroduce newer
version to the tree later? Or, even simpler, what's the problem with just
keeping the new version unstable until new "unbroken" one is introducedor the
"new way"becomes accepted?
George
On Sunday 28 July 2013 21:25:53 Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what are our current heuristics to decide if a package goes into main
> tree or stays in the science overlay? Two years ago I spent a lot of
> time to get my beloved Macaulay2 tree ready and we even had a stable
> version (getting old now). Stabilising a new version is blocked among
> other things because the build system does not respect a custom AR (bug
> 474784) and RANLIB (bug 474788). Even if its not too hard, I'm not
> going to fix those. This would be just ridiculous. I probably know all
> the users of Macaulay2 on Gentoo personally. None of them want to use a
> different ar. So, should I treeclean M2 and move it back to overlay
> only?
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-29 11:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-28 19:25 [gentoo-science] science overlay vs. main tree Thomas Kahle
2013-07-29 11:45 ` George Shapovalov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox