public inbox for gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fbissey@slingshot.co.nz
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] is numpy using the old lapack interface?
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:06:38 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121102120638.nswko880g8k4w0kc@webmail.slingshot.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121101152558.GZ22436@schlaumatte>

Quoting Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org>:

> On 09:42 Thu 01 Nov 2012, fbissey@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
>> Quoting Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org>:
>>
>> > One more thing, This is fixed in 1.6 tree of numpy, where the
>> > call to gfortran uses what is in the site config.
>> > Will sage move to a higher version of numpy at some point?
>> >
>> >
>> Yes! The problem that prevent us to upgrade numpy is fixed in numpy-1.7. The
>> release cannot come quickly enough for us.
>
> OK.  Any idea when this will happen?
>
>> For numpy 1.5 would by any chance gfortran be called with -fexternal-blas at
>> some point?
>
> Can't find '-fexternal' in build.log.
>
>> On my system with python 3.2 lapack was not properly detected,
>> that's why dotblas hasn't been built. Numpy 1.5.1 with python 3.2 used an
>> internal implementation of the lapack functions it uses.
>>
>> This probably explains why scipy doesn't compile with numpy 1.5 and 
>> python 3.2.
>
> And this where all this started for me ...
>
> Anyway, the solution of my broken numpy,scipy is to wait for 1.7 or
> rollback to a reference-lapack that installs itself as liblapack?
>

If you don't use numpy with python 3.x you could simply create a file
/etc/portage/env/dev-python/numpy with USE_PYTHON="2.7" in it.
That would skip the offending problem quite nicely without locking you
in a particular blas implementation.

Francois





  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-02  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-29 17:38 [gentoo-science] is numpy using the old lapack interface? Thomas Kahle
2012-10-29 18:27 ` Francois Bissey
2012-10-30 16:56   ` Thomas Kahle
2012-10-31 17:24   ` Thomas Kahle
2012-10-31 17:29   ` Thomas Kahle
2012-10-31 20:42     ` fbissey
2012-11-01 15:25       ` Thomas Kahle
2012-11-01 23:06         ` fbissey [this message]
2012-12-01  2:27           ` Thomas Kahle
2012-12-02  9:23             ` Francois Bissey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121102120638.nswko880g8k4w0kc@webmail.slingshot.co.nz \
    --to=fbissey@slingshot.co.nz \
    --cc=gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox