From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025FD1381F4 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ADD1E0874 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.120]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B63E08E0 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:08:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=Dq0kizSTVBBdp3Ih28nM8AnXQSyF61j3BVNQKPxBFoM=; b=OBNfoAOwyMyuB6IA5eqqwrh+gAIbfOXQqqL1I4P5zEL82QduaPDEZj1RyN8rgNNzRJpPfZTVXUTsXmN1Znk3pMHRDuWVH1GXP7liH+rTW5EmoDCiJz/yAf+9ButijyFzqYqxB53wCpc0AbwSw32Kx9fAvMX9WLvXlD/DQm7pfDo=; Received: from [78.83.152.208] (helo=Ganymede) by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1T21gj-0005eC-Ns ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:08:46 +0300 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:10:19 +0300 From: v_2e@ukr.net To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] [sage-on-gentoo] cannot build Sage because of Sympy-0.7.1 Message-Id: <20120816181019.df796cbce1ac4f973c96066f@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <3918646.x0op0JfapO@vrooom-vrooom> References: <20120814204917.0b6b06b1dd59a826ae08d5ca@ukr.net> <20120816100316.fvwogosgc04o08ko@webmail.slingshot.co.nz> <20120816110536.80822b34f12353b6f8367845@ukr.net> <3918646.x0op0JfapO@vrooom-vrooom> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 000cfba5-a24a-4dc5-a97d-a47206138770 X-Archives-Hash: 39bae6d14a8c1509a45feeea69a9607b On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:28:07 +1200 Francois Bissey wrote: > you have numpy-1.6.xx installed don't you? I am adding that to the > list of pains related to the fact we are stuck with numpy-1.5 No, I don't. In fact, numpy-1.6 has been masked in my /etc/portage/package.mask file for a while. Currently I've got dev-python/numpy-1.5.1 installed. Regards, Vladimir -----