Re: [gentoo-science] numpy conflict with sage-on-gentoo

[Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1763 bytes --]

On 06:32 Thu 31 May 2012, fbissey@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
[...]

> > ... and now it pulls in eselect-cblas and gsl which are blocking each other:
> >
> > [blocks B      ] app-admin/eselect-cblas ("app-admin/eselect-cblas" 
> > is blocking sci-libs/gsl-1.15-r2)
> >
> >  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
> >  * installed at the same time on the same system.
> >
> >   (app-admin/eselect-cblas-0.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) 
> > pulled in by
> >     app-admin/eselect-cblas required by 
> > (sci-libs/cblas-reference-20030223-r4::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for 
> > merge)
> >
> >   (sci-libs/gsl-1.15-r2::science, installed) pulled in by
> >     sci-libs/gsl required by (media-gfx/inkscape-0.48.2::gentoo, installed)
> >     >=sci-libs/gsl-1.15 required by 
> > (sci-mathematics/sage-5.0-r1::sage-on-gentoo, ebuild scheduled for 
> > merge)
> >
> I think that's a different problem. You are using blas stuff from the science
> overlay but the version of cblas-reference from the main tree as a higher
> version number than the one from the science overlay (3. something?). So you
> probably have to mask sci-libs/cblas-reference::gentoo.

In fact, I'm trying this on a mostly stable system which resulted in the
very old =sci-libs/cblas-reference-20030223-r4 being pulled in.  I used
the autounmask feature of portage which did not spot the resolution of
this conflict: (unmasking sci-libs/cblas-reference-20110218 from
science).

> For your original problem, yes portage should solve the conflict, this is very
> strange, are numpy or scipy part of your world file?

Neither.  In in the process of building now.

Cheers,
Thomas

-- 
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]