* [gentoo-science] Using the new blas/lapack scheme
@ 2012-02-19 21:58 James Cloos
2012-02-19 22:18 ` fbissey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Cloos @ 2012-02-19 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
How does one update an ebuild to support the new /etc/env.d/alternatives
scheme for blas, lapack, et al?
As an example, sci-libs/libghemical (in the main tree) fails to build
because it cannot find -lblas.
Is it just a matter of patching the build system to use pkg-config for
blas? Or is there a better way?
-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] Using the new blas/lapack scheme
2012-02-19 21:58 [gentoo-science] Using the new blas/lapack scheme James Cloos
@ 2012-02-19 22:18 ` fbissey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: fbissey @ 2012-02-19 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Quoting James Cloos <cloos+gentoo-science@jhcloos.com>:
> How does one update an ebuild to support the new /etc/env.d/alternatives
> scheme for blas, lapack, et al?
>
> As an example, sci-libs/libghemical (in the main tree) fails to build
> because it cannot find -lblas.
>
> Is it just a matter of patching the build system to use pkg-config for
> blas? Or is there a better way?
>
Hi,
My own understanding is to patch the build system to use pkg-config. It is not
always easy but that's the only way that can really works with the new scheme.
Francois
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-19 23:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-19 21:58 [gentoo-science] Using the new blas/lapack scheme James Cloos
2012-02-19 22:18 ` fbissey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox