From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RuWde-0002uE-As for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:02:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F9D0E075B for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxi2.callplus.net.nz (mx194.callplus.net.nz [202.180.66.194]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1E8E06D0 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EAGRIME/KtEIE/2dsb2JhbABDhQurP4FyAQEEASNbCwgDGgImAgJXGYd8plqSIYEviX8BHgQGAgYBNRKCdgIBCwIeAoEAPIIGgRYElSeScg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,372,1325415600"; d="scan'208";a="240874537" Received: from wmsrv3.tranzpeer.net (HELO localhost) ([202.180.66.4]) by ismtp2.tranzpeer.net with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2012 10:39:43 +1300 Received: from 202.36.179.68 ([202.36.179.68]) by webmail.slingshot.co.nz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:32:15 +1300 Message-ID: <20120207103215.6ioso8w0ckowosow@webmail.slingshot.co.nz> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:32:15 +1300 From: fbissey@slingshot.co.nz To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sage-on-gentoo and science duplicates References: <20120206145728.GL5367@schlaumatte.Speedport_W_723V_Typ_A> In-Reply-To: <20120206145728.GL5367@schlaumatte.Speedport_W_723V_Typ_A> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs X-Originating-IP: 202.36.179.68 X-Archives-Salt: d6d41a5e-664d-4a5e-a618-f9da81d81ef3 X-Archives-Hash: 3ae94052bbdf16d9af810cb03d205e40 Quoting Thomas Kahle : > Hi, > > I've run the attached script to find duplicates of packages from > sage-on-gentoo in science. The output was: > > $ ./find-overlay-dups.sh > sci-chemistry/jmol > sci-libs/fplll > sci-libs/givaro > sci-libs/iml > sci-libs/m4ri > sci-libs/symmetrica > sci-mathematics/gap > sci-mathematics/polybori > > > What do people think about merging those versions in the science overlay > and removing them from sage-on-gentoo (or vice-versa)? Probably in most > cases there are additional fixes in sage-on-gentoo that science users > could benefit from (or at least should hurt nobody)? > Hi, Since Christopher and I have access to the science overlay we should do some clean up and synchronization. Let's see case by case: jmol, there are a few differences between mine and the science overlay, jeffro and I are not in tune regarding EAPI and that's the main source of differences (last time I looked). fplll, givaro, iml, m4ri and polybori we are probably ahead. In fact we probably put them in science in the first place. symmetrica and gap we are probably ahead as well because I am not sure anyone else maintain them. Synchronization requires some time. About merging. Why not if you are ok with our cruft.... like old pexpect that has moved out of the tree, our own python ebuild (until 2.7.3 is finally released), I carry a special version of R for OS X on prefix (have to fill the bug for that one). old networkx because the one we need as dropped of the main tree.... Cheers, Francois