public inbox for gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sage-on-gentoo and science duplicates
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:24:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207102438.GW5367@schlaumatte.Speedport_W_723V_Typ_A> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207103215.6ioso8w0ckowosow@webmail.slingshot.co.nz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2044 bytes --]

On 10:32 Tue 07 Feb 2012, fbissey@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
> > I've run the attached script to find duplicates of packages from
> > sage-on-gentoo in science.  The output was:
> >
> > $ ./find-overlay-dups.sh
> > sci-chemistry/jmol
> > sci-libs/fplll
> > sci-libs/givaro
> > sci-libs/iml
> > sci-libs/m4ri
> > sci-libs/symmetrica
> > sci-mathematics/gap
> > sci-mathematics/polybori
> >
> >
> > What do people think about merging those versions in the science overlay
> > and removing them from sage-on-gentoo (or vice-versa)?  Probably in most
> > cases there are additional fixes in sage-on-gentoo that science users
> > could benefit from (or at least should hurt nobody)?
> 
> Since Christopher and I have access to the science overlay we should
> do some clean up and synchronization.
> Let's see case by case:
> jmol, there are a few differences between mine and the science overlay,
> jeffro and I are not in tune regarding EAPI and that's the main source of
> differences (last time I looked).
> fplll, givaro, iml, m4ri and polybori we are probably ahead. In fact we
> probably put them in science in the first place. symmetrica and gap we are
> probably ahead as well because I am not sure anyone else maintain them.
> 
> Synchronization requires some time.
> 
> About merging. Why not if you are ok with our cruft....

Well, just remove the cruft ;)

> like old pexpect that has moved out of the tree, our own python ebuild (until
> 2.7.3 is finally released), I carry a special version of R for OS X on prefix
> (have to fill the bug for that one). old networkx because the one we need as
> dropped of the main tree....

One thing that comes to mind: Github has some really giganto-awesome
features it seems.  You seem to use them and since science is hosted on
gentoo's infrastructure you don't have the issue tracker and online pull
request mangling.  Actually, it would be great to have those for
science too.

Cheers,
Thomas



-- 
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-07 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-06 14:57 [gentoo-science] sage-on-gentoo and science duplicates Thomas Kahle
2012-02-06 16:37 ` v_2e
2012-02-06 21:32 ` fbissey
2012-02-07 10:24   ` Thomas Kahle [this message]
2012-02-07 10:25   ` Burcin Erocal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120207102438.GW5367@schlaumatte.Speedport_W_723V_Typ_A \
    --to=tomka@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox