From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QzaW5-0001oe-2G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:39:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2227221C064; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxi2.callplus.net.nz (mx194.callplus.net.nz [202.180.66.194]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F64F21C026 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:38:46 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnsGAB4+YU7KtEIE/2dsb2JhbABChE2UbJAogUYBAQQBI1sLCAMaAiYCAiE2GYdypk2RY4EshCiBEQSdKIcm X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,320,1312113600"; d="scan'208";a="211644563" Received: from wmsrv3.tranzpeer.net (HELO localhost) ([202.180.66.4]) by ismtp2.tranzpeer.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2011 08:38:44 +1200 Received: from 202-180-123-3.callplus.net.nz (202-180-123-3.callplus.net.nz [202.180.123.3]) by webmail.slingshot.co.nz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 08:33:57 +1200 Message-ID: <20110903083357.gkk8s8o0og08w8g0@webmail.slingshot.co.nz> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 08:33:57 +1200 From: fbissey@slingshot.co.nz To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] new blas infrastructure and prefix References: <20110831074912.r0j4s0kscs4kg84c@webmail.slingshot.co.nz> <20110903012725.cx0kgss04coo8swg@webmail.slingshot.co.nz> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs X-Originating-IP: 202.180.123.3 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 938dbc06f9386b8f0f153f6765b6dffa Quoting Andrea Arteaga : > Hi Francois. > So, the package lapack-reference is emerged, but the test suite fails, right? > Could you just write a very basic C or Fortran program using a routine > of the LAPACK and compile it with the instruction of pkg-config > lapack, after having emerged lapack-reference and skipped the tests? > I will look into that. For the record, while I didn't run the test for the main prefix tree version (ie not the science overlay) it worked fine as far as I can tell - the sage testsuite runs a number of tests which depend on a working lapack. Francois