public inbox for gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Schwan <cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de>
To: <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sci-libs/mpir for the main tree
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:22:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012171422.34832.cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217130016.GE15522@denkmatte.Speedport_W_502V_Typ_A>

Hi,

On Friday 17 December 2010 14:00:16 Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 21:19 Tue 09 Nov     , François Bissey wrote:
> > > my next migration victim will be mpir, the friendly clone of gmp.  The
> > > current ebuild is the same in sage-on-gentoo and science.  It has this
> > > assembler stuff in it that I don't understand.  Who did this? What is
> > > the latest here, can we remove the fat TODO-banner (or DO it?).
> > > 
> > > Any other hints/objections?  (Yes, I know that there is a bump
> > > waiting...)
> > 
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > Christopher did it. mpir like gmp suffer from executable stacks.
> > There are talk on sage-devel which is very close to mpir upstream
> > to take a different approach: using an m4 macro and a linker flag
> > to remove them -Wl,-z,noexecstack.
> > The motivation to fix this is fedora 14 which doesn't allow executable
> > stacks by default.
> 
> The changelog of mpir-2.2 shows:
> 
> -) Enable noexecstack for x86/x86_64 with GCC
> 
> So what should be done to use this in our ebuild.  I tried to simply
> append -Wl,-z,noexecstack to ldflags, but this did nothing.

Mpir's configure scripts looks like its adding "-Wl,-z,noexecstack" if it 
detects a gcc+x86/amd64 configuration - so I guess noexecstack should work out 
of the box. If it does not I would consider this as broken.

> 
> Cheers,
> Thomas

Cheers,

Christopher



  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-08 23:42 [gentoo-science] sci-libs/mpir for the main tree Thomas Kahle
2010-11-09  8:19 ` François Bissey
2010-11-10  8:41   ` Christopher Schwan
2010-11-11 19:11     ` Thomas Kahle
2010-11-11 20:22       ` François Bissey
2010-11-11 20:30         ` François Bissey
2010-11-11 19:35     ` Thomas Kahle
2010-12-17 13:00   ` Thomas Kahle
2010-12-17 13:22     ` Christopher Schwan [this message]
2010-12-17 13:55       ` Thomas Kahle
2010-12-17 14:16         ` Christopher Schwan
2010-12-17 15:03           ` Thomas Kahle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201012171422.34832.cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de \
    --to=cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de \
    --cc=gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox