From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PPWk9-0003uY-FS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:48:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E297E073F; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32149E073F for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dhcp07.mittag-leffler.se [130.237.201.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tomka) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7580E1B416D for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:46:00 +0100 From: Thomas Kahle To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Gentoo Science next meeting agenda - 3) sub-herds Message-ID: <20101206084600.GE2734@denkmatte.mittag-leffler.se> References: <4CFB889F.7010000@gentoo.org> <4CFBC836.6040605@gentoo.org> <20101205115710.1c8545cd@sousie> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101205115710.1c8545cd@sousie> X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 0ac44360-1669-44e9-a707-691f0ce598d2 X-Archives-Hash: 8a696d9f8bb3c70d04bb5115308ed06b --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11:57 Sun 05 Dec , S=E9bastien Fabbro wrote: > Kacper Kowalik wrote: >=20 > > As we can see > > * sci-physics \in sci > > * sci-chemistry \in sci (except Donnie) > > * sci-biology \in sci > > * sci-mathematics \in sci (except Rafael) >=20 > Splitting herds is not only be about email receiving which can be > easily turned on by adding an email to the alias or turned off with > procmail rules. > I was thinking also about web page, profiles, and may be as Rafael > showed it would create a sense of more accessible community. I can see > how people might discard the possibility of devship by seeing a few > hundreds packages and bugs in one giant herd.=20 I agree here. Similary to Rafael I would also like to receive sci-math bugspam but not sci-*. I also don't see any good pros of joining the herds except some abstract "simplification". You can still subscribe to all of the sci-? aliases if you are working on everything. So what was the point of joining the herds in the first place? > For those of us interested in all science packages, we could simply put > sci as alias of all sci sub herds, or even create QA sci. I like the first idea, but I also want to be able to use "sci" as a herd, e.g. for scientific libraries that might be used across disciplines. Cheers, Thomas --=20 Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAkz8osgACgkQQYXt1pFHaaF0PgQAt3uZYNHPXcLRQkEh+nl3bofN 2tZzePBQRPT5ErshBpRIKAvcxKbfDCRlWtB3JkDfx+K7Q5FzfDpxhJvgXaXKVrr+ /Jz1oeQet89JUcWTebgm7mogcX5SWiBtYY4tgJ5vlWyHkJJGEKdSNjx7Orm+QTMD b9xf0tb+EzuY+HiozhI= =o5Di -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc--