From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PN1DC-0002wO-0c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:43:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36A97E0748; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailgate-01.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate-01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.241]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64A6E0748 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:43:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-mainz.de; i=cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de; q=dns/txt; s=ironport; t=1291027396; x=1322563396; h=from:to:subject:date:references:in-reply-to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:message-id; z=From:=20Christopher=20Schwan=20|To:=20|Subject: =20Re:=20[gentoo-science]=20[sage-on-gentoo]=20Sage-4.5.3 =20segmentation=20fault|Date:=20Mon,=2029=20Nov=202010=20 11:43:10=20+0100|References:=20<20101026123223.d0b84170.v _2e@ukr.net>=20<201011110951.37839.cschwan@students.uni-m ainz.de>=20<30308916.post@talk.nabble.com>|In-Reply-To: =20<30308916.post@talk.nabble.com>|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Message-ID:=20<201011291143.10495.cschwan@students.uni-m ainz.de>; bh=pYD1NukJHZtco/WZjHQAut8APNNmmR7kyDesdVatJ3I=; b=idHh3OVBtOPjUUZcohi0TQhH+MhBES6aKnLE1xaT7yprGut0jwf0ZD8b jYRl7rB4yZWr+IR6AAefG7Xi6rHAR+L/L5QluFc3YJGcEARochnMUkiK3 3ciQrYy+oZXmUMq9kuKbLrMVTl5OIE3ei7O0aCkrH9RhRcTvEJ9u6uMGI c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvMFAAQT80wKXgZY/2dsb2JhbACDUJErjnKxU5AjgSGDM3MEjXY Received: from e14hub-02.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([10.94.6.88]) by mailgate-01.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2010 11:43:15 +0100 Received: from gnuke-notebook.localnet (134.93.87.197) by mail.uni-mainz.de (10.94.6.90) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:43:14 +0100 From: Christopher Schwan To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] [sage-on-gentoo] Sage-4.5.3 segmentation fault Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:43:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-gentoo-r12; KDE/4.5.3; i686; ; ) References: <20101026123223.d0b84170.v_2e@ukr.net> <201011110951.37839.cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de> <30308916.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <30308916.post@talk.nabble.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <201011291143.10495.cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de> X-Originating-IP: [134.93.87.197] X-Archives-Salt: 41fb1a8c-7037-48d0-975b-9c802bf9b11a X-Archives-Hash: fbdeb9ffce6dd65a98953b648fd31000 Hi, On Friday 26 November 2010 12:32:35 Jari_42 wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Just to report that I can reproduce this exact error on my amd64 gentoo > install with Sage-4.6-r1 and python-2.6.6-r1. Thanks for reporting! So it looks like this is not problem specific to just= one=20 computer - if there is anybody else who has the same problem, please write = a=20 mail to me (you do not need to mail to the list) and attach a file with the= =20 emerge --info output. I would also like to have emerge --info from Jari -=20 hopefully I can find a difference to my system. Unfortunately, I can not reproduce this error on amd64. This weekend I=20 upgraded Sage in a prefixed environment to 4.6 but that went fine. After=20 upgrading gcc to 4.5.1 I recompiled my entire prefix (emerge -e @world), bu= t I=20 still can not reproduce it. =46or the time being, I can only recommend these general instructions: 1. make sure everything is up-to-date 2. make sure revdep-rebuild reports no package If you have spare cpu time you may recompile world (this sounds really craz= y,=20 but I am running out of options ;) ) or at least Sage and it dependencies: emerge -C sage emerge --depclean -a emerge sage This would make sure you do not have unintential old packages installed (th= is=20 may have happened if I had done major changes to ebuilds without upgrading= =20 their revision number - this "should" not be the case, of course). Christopher >=20 > Thanks, > Jari >=20 > On Thursday 11 November 2010 00:00:20 v_2e@ukr.net wrote: > > Hello! > >=20 > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:08:28 +1300 > >=20 > > Fran=C3=A7ois Bissey wrote: > > > thanks for the debugging trace Vladimir. > > > It looks like the problem is in pynac, it may be a compatibility > > > problem with python 2.6.6. You have gone in uncharted territories > > > with this version of python. Christopher knows more about pynac > > > than me, he may be able to do something about it. > > >=20 > > > Thanks for the report. > > >=20 > > > Francois > > >=20 > > I just wanted to report that Sage-4.6-r1 shows exactly the same > >=20 > > behaviour with python-2.6.6-r1. > >=20 > > ----- > >=20 > >