From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P3KNe-0004g5-H2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:09:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49E3CE098F; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 03:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxi2.callplus.net.nz (mx194.callplus.net.nz [202.180.66.194]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C0AE098F for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 03:09:01 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag0GAGeFq0x8xQFN/2dsb2JhbACUMo4McsQGhUcEikA Received: from 124-197-1-77.callplus.net.nz (HELO vrooom.localnet) ([124.197.1.77]) by ismtp02.callplus.net.nz with ESMTP; 06 Oct 2010 16:08:59 +1300 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois_Bissey?= To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sci-mathematics/maxima fails to build Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:08:59 +1300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo-r7; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) References: <1286324661.21123.5@ledaig> In-Reply-To: <1286324661.21123.5@ledaig> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201010061608.59484.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz> X-Archives-Salt: 426e1225-3826-4171-abbf-04652d676a1c X-Archives-Hash: 645c6ed882b19bd23539f4609e656c7a > On 10/05/10 - 18:57:56, Fran=E7ois Bissey wrote: > > > Hi group! > > >=20 > > > I've got some problems installing sci-mathematics/maxima in both my > >=20 > > Funtoo > >=20 > > > boxes. > > >=20 > > > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/271383/ > > >=20 > > > The issue seems to be similar to : > > > http://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/issue/14, and the > > > work-around to redefining LDFLAGS works as well. However, something > >=20 > > is > >=20 > > > wrong with the way maxima deals with the LDFLAGS. > >=20 > > OK I will have a look, it may be something I overlooked in my > > patches, it used > > to work here, so it may be caused by a slight change somewhere in the > > system > > since then. > >=20 > > If you want maxima for sage you don't have to use the version located > > in the > > science overlay. It was a proof of concept for some patches. The > > version in > > portage will work just as well. > > 5.20.1-r2 > > Francois >=20 > For what it's worth, on my amd64 I'm unable to build the portage > maxima-5.20.1-r2 either with >=20 > LDFLAGS=3D"-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" >=20 > There is the same >=20 > make[1]: *** [binary-ecl/maxima] Error 1 >=20 > In fact ecls will not even configure with the indicated LDFLAGS. > Deleting "-Wl,--sort-common" allows ecls as well as maxima to be built. >=20 OK I tested both: LDFLAGS=3D"-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" emerge -1v --nodeps m= axima LDFLAGS=3D"-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" emerge -1v --nodeps e= cls which build respectively maxima-5.20.1-r3 and ecls-10.4.1, on my x86 system= =20 and it merged fine. Does it work in your 32bits chroot Steve? =46rancois