From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou18q-0001cc-Nl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:47:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9B93E075B; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxi2.callplus.net.nz (mx194.callplus.net.nz [202.180.66.194]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9CAE075B for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:47:12 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYFAIKpiUx8xQFN/2dsb2JhbACUAo0/crxHhT0EiiA Received: from 124-197-1-77.callplus.net.nz (HELO vrooom.localnet) ([124.197.1.77]) by ismtp02.callplus.net.nz with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2010 22:47:11 +1200 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois_Bissey?= To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] [sage-on-gentoo] numpy-1.4.1/scipy-0.8.0 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:47:10 +1200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo-r7; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) References: <1284042156.17649.0@pavilion64> In-Reply-To: <1284042156.17649.0@pavilion64> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201009102247.10601.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz> X-Archives-Salt: f25da689-8c9c-4ca1-91e4-bc27585cb3bd X-Archives-Hash: 30f6db38cb9ac2284b8f7cbf8c462357 > On 09/09/2010 03:47:27 AM, Fran=E7ois Bissey wrote: > > Hi Steve, > >=20 > > just to be clear, when you enter the data of the test manually in sage > > there is no problems? > > We already have one test like that, and there are a few reports of > > phantom failing tests on sage-devel so it is possible. > >=20 > > Francois >=20 > Fran=E7ois , >=20 > When the following >=20 > sage: x =3D polygen(GF(121, 'a')) > sage: C =3D HyperellipticCurve(x^5 + x - 1, x^2 + 2) > sage: len(C.points()) > 122 >=20 > is entered manually I get the expected result. The last line of the sage > input is where >=20 > sage -t -force_lib > "devel/sage/sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hyperelliptic_finite_field.= py > " >=20 > fails. I downgraded to >=20 > sage-doc-4.5.2-r1 > numpy-1.3.0-r2 > scipy-0.7.2-r1 > sage-4.5.2-r1 >=20 > and the test passed. I then upgraded to the latest sage-doc, numpy, scipy > and sage and the test passed, but only the first time. On subsequent tries > the test has failed. >=20 The important bit, I think, is that when you enter the data manually you ge= t=20 the expected results. There is quite possibly something wrong with the=20 doctests framework. Some of it may come from the port to Gentoo, but as I said there are other people in the sage community that wonder about=20 the same thing. We probably should enter that as a recorded issue on github, other people may get it from time to time. =46rancois