From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OmMdC-00042c-S0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:07:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0387E09B2; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailgate-01.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate-01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.241]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533E6E09B2 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:07:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-mainz.de; i=cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de; q=dns/txt; s=ironport; t=1282291621; x=1313827621; h=from:to:subject:date:references:in-reply-to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:message-id; z=From:=20Christopher=20Schwan=20|To:=20|Subject: =20Re:=20[gentoo-science]=20[sage-on-gentoo]=20polybori =20&&=20amd64|Date:=20Fri,=2020=20Aug=202010=2010:06:53 =20+0200|References:=20<1282239159.23504.0@pavilion64> |In-Reply-To:=20<1282239159.23504.0@pavilion64> |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |Message-ID:=20<201008201006.54121.cschwan@students.uni-m ainz.de>; bh=lb5s0HXGvOqA4x5SLWPNGd6IU5MWao96npXOGQQA5Xw=; b=cuFZTARC7lst3QDawmyfm5kfDkrHFfXjw7CkLRTC2E98PUmP2Y8XcZ5t e3NguVmOksZ7q3AHHm6LkUDyrm4LgM8GjO/+IYn/vOAxbjG7tE3zxsvAJ 3sgJmfVClZM7LbP+VkOa0w8qjkUy3Lr00CWB/KjyMkmYYD2rFjmAVJbDQ A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtwEAILUbUwKXgZY/2dsb2JhbACTO44Ruw2FNwSMYA Received: from e14hub-02.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([10.94.6.88]) by mailgate-01.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2010 10:06:59 +0200 Received: from gnuke-notebook.localnet (134.93.86.71) by mail.uni-mainz.de (10.94.6.90) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.208.1; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:06:59 +0200 From: Christopher Schwan To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] [sage-on-gentoo] polybori && amd64 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:06:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) References: <1282239159.23504.0@pavilion64> In-Reply-To: <1282239159.23504.0@pavilion64> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <201008201006.54121.cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de> X-Originating-IP: [134.93.86.71] X-Archives-Salt: 5c99699d-840e-4c24-a30b-236dbb1e4a1d X-Archives-Hash: 306072ead7b5a5c86878c9d378945d29 Hi Steve, On Thursday 19 August 2010 19:32:23 Steven Trogdon wrote: > On 08/19/2010 03:04:54 AM, Christopher Schwan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thursday 19 August 2010 08:14:08 Steven Trogdon wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Both polybori-0.6.4-r1 and polybori-0.6.5 fail to build here on amd64 > >> for the same reason. The important snippet is: > >> > >> rm: cannot remove > >> `/var/tmp/portage/sci-mathematics/polybori-0.6.4-r1/image//usr/lib64/lib > >> *.s o*': No such file or directory > >> > >> * ERROR: sci-mathematics/polybori-0.6.4-r1 failed: > >> * failed to remove shared objects > >> * > >> * Call stack: > >> * ebuild.sh, line 54: Called src_install > >> * environment, line 5124: Called die > >> * The specific snippet of code: > >> * rm "${ED}"/usr/$(get_libdir)/lib*.so* || die "failed to remove > >> > >> shared objects" > >> > >> * > >> > >> Under the /image directory polybori installs the libs under /usr/lib > >> instead of /usr/lib64. This seemed to be an issue previously with > >> polybori. > > > > Fixed in overlay - I will try to find find out how to install to lib64 on > > amd64. > > With the present commit I get multilib-strict failures. I forgot about > this! I put the following: > > sed -i "s:DevelInstPath('lib'):DevelInstPath('$(get_libdir)'):g" \ > SConstruct || die "sed failed" > > in src_prepare and libs are installed under /usr/lib64 on amd64 and under > /usr/lib on my 32bit chroot. I'm not sure if this is the "correct" way to > fix things but maybe it'll give some direction. Thank you for your info! I will update polybori later this day (I currently do not have access to an amd64 machine) and see if its possible to fix this issue with an command line argument (that would be the correct way). Besides polybori, do you have any other multilib-strict failures for sage- related ebuilds ? > > >> Steve > > > > Christopher > > Steve Christopher