From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OHF9S-0006Dl-AA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:51:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A4A3E0940; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38219E0940 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1508720wyf.40 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:51:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=11Fnkdy2/e7bgL8lATpqjJ+4bh4z2xCNk7nV+FBkSrc=; b=gsrvtYOcUAcXqAhcZ/Li1XSwFGflktolZ1FmlzXvtJgooV3fX/O5AZfI/tHJZV3UjG s7i3WO21QO7IJSQhlNL9GnrtWW8RnpFOmD1rxvn+SDiZZWH13PNoXr0aPZA6ahCfR6Hj bnNh/dS86Wasl0dRbFMGNOfLqUgNSNtBFjUsI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=XT6947nniL1gJ2qZ7A+egFs61W9M6Lzmgq2wLY1K09Ouv2pIWpYLKTsJ84PIGiuslW fyiJU9VTqEtTW8Q2P5fQ9ahWtjMWk8nvaCxbwfMO8S3muku486HzTV+arjE1EEgt5EkG VBL/FOv6mMLaDrcXS4mAJwgSzBYVcbgODO+ng= Received: by 10.227.134.194 with SMTP id k2mr8380138wbt.118.1274874700356; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (148.55.220.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.220.55.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y31sm78710wby.22.2010.05.26.04.51.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 26 May 2010 04:51:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Juan Aguado To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] R and Blas Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 13:51:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo-r7; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201005262315.42699.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz> In-Reply-To: <201005262315.42699.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005261351.31660.juantxorena@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 592425c8-2bf8-49ab-ad9f-095653352ce2 X-Archives-Hash: 1ffd32689b01eb877c47cec359a12180 > Hi all, > > I noticed that R currently has a useflag for lapack but > not for blas - which is also a configure option. > Is there any reason for that? > > Just as a background I am looking at bumping vtk to > version 5.6.0 and it can use R. But if you do, it wants > R to be built with both blas and lapack support. > > Francois > R hard-depends on blas (see the ebuild). Lapack depends on blas anyway. Regards,