From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ODEhz-0006wa-6k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 10:35:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65280E06E7; Sat, 15 May 2010 10:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailgate-01.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate-01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.241]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AFDE06E7 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-mainz.de; i=cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de; q=dns/txt; s=ironport; t=1273919677; x=1305455677; h=from:to:subject:date:references:in-reply-to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:message-id; z=From:=20Christopher=20Schwan=20|To:=20|Subject: =20Re:=20[gentoo-science]=20Sage:=20Random=20exit=20failu res=20on=20amd64|Date:=20Sat,=2015=20May=202010=2012:34:3 0=20+0200|References:=20<1273859046.22330.8@ledaig> |In-Reply-To:=20<1273859046.22330.8@ledaig>|MIME-Version: =201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|Message-ID:=20<2 01005151234.30599.cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de>; bh=pjJusEgO1JIEtccb1LiWZHAr6xx6cLSrM0LAL25SGPw=; b=Z42KXGIYatNsKmhXRXFSYm1P+solQdlpxYfbLqNN764wbsyLNXHoFLl1 RhdDzof/04939oaB52kKZ3axSmfaqOC827DxT3ri9nv38DF/InKMQbP07 lkbNYqkbIBZ4xYwaRU4em4KlFODuGgUMheNn1WjjVvlmyKqex43N2LUV3 Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFADsV7ksKXgZY/2dsb2JhbACSBIxvulmFEAQ Received: from e14hub-02.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([10.94.6.88]) by mailgate-01.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 15 May 2010 12:34:36 +0200 Received: from gnuke-notebook.localnet (79.211.218.131) by mail.uni-mainz.de (10.94.6.90) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.160.2; Sat, 15 May 2010 12:34:35 +0200 From: Christopher Schwan To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64 Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 12:34:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.4.3; i686; ; ) References: <1273859046.22330.8@ledaig> In-Reply-To: <1273859046.22330.8@ledaig> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <201005151234.30599.cschwan@students.uni-mainz.de> X-Archives-Salt: d17287bf-2c97-4e41-8e78-e1758dbf25ea X-Archives-Hash: 473d597a7bf3754a4d2a083e6e490f49 Hi Steven, On Friday 14 May 2010 19:44:06 Steven Trogdon wrote: > On 05/14/10 - 01:55:21, Christopher Schwan wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > > > maybe I cheered too soon - could you please try to install > > sage-core-4.3.5-r1? > > That is the version which failed for me if I did not do something > > wrong. I > > also noticed that it took longer to trigger SIGABRT with this version. > > OK, the test suite has completed on a second machine using > sage-core-4.3.5-r1 backported to 4.3.5. I get _no_ SIGABRT failures > here. I did notice that the order in which the tests are run depends on > the machine. I'm not sure how the ordering is decided but, perhaps, a > particular order is more inclined to produce SIGABRT failures? > > Steve On my amd64 it is still the same situation: I reinstalled sage-4.3.5-r1 and I still get SIGABRT failures. Even worse, downgrading to sage-4.3.5 showed the same failures, so I think the problem (additionally ?) lies somewhere in Sage's dependencies ... I am preparing a script which outputs a list of Sage's dependencies and their versions so we can compare it. Christopher