From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-science+bounces-1022-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1O7xdI-0001RB-Dr
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:20:24 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 009E5E076B;
	Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:20:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mxi2.callplus.net.nz (mx194.callplus.net.nz [202.180.66.194])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C71E076B
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:20:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsFACLm2kt34DCL/2dsb2JhbACRBYwfcr8FhRIE
Received: from 119-224-48-139.callplus.net.nz (HELO vrooom.localnet) ([119.224.48.139])
  by ismtp02.callplus.net.nz with ESMTP; 01 May 2010 09:20:12 +1200
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois_Bissey?= <f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz>
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] problem with sage-core-4.4
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 09:20:11 +1200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.4.2; i686; ; )
References: <201004301424.39301.mk224@st.amu.edu.pl>
In-Reply-To: <201004301424.39301.mk224@st.amu.edu.pl>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-science+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-science.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201005010920.11434.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz>
X-Archives-Salt: 03312947-8da2-4478-82dc-48ab73837ac4
X-Archives-Hash: bd3d5263f818dcbb88d18f60fb1324f3

Hi Marek,

I see that you are using the new python-2.6.5-r99 *which* is 
experimental at this point.
Has cython been rebuild after the python upgrade? If not
you should do that first.
I may be able to determine if python is the culprit on Monday.

Francois