[gentoo-science] gfan

[gentoo-science] gfan

[Thomas Kahle]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 744 bytes --]

Hi Sage-on-Gentoo team,

This mail is informative, no action required. I just saw that you are
having gfan in your overlay. I also have it the science overlay. You
apply a patch (which I don't) with

        # TODO: find out what this patch actually fixes
        epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${P}-fix-polynomial.patch

I also know the author of the software a little. Let's join forces and
work on it in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293381

Regards,
Thomas




-- 
Thomas Kahle

The fundamental theorem of algebra is open source. Like any other
mathematical theorem it can be applied free of charge and everybody
has access to its proof and can convince himself how it works. Why
should software be any different?


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 380 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-science] gfan

[François Bissey]

> Hi Sage-on-Gentoo team,
> 
> This mail is informative, no action required. I just saw that you are
> having gfan in your overlay. I also have it the science overlay. You
> apply a patch (which I don't) with
> 
>         # TODO: find out what this patch actually fixes
>         epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${P}-fix-polynomial.patch
> 
> I also know the author of the software a little. Let's join forces and
> work on it in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293381
> 
Hi Thomas,

So you put it in science overlay, I was wondering if I had done that a
few month back and didn't remember ;)
The patch comes from the sage sources.

Francois

Re: [gentoo-science] gfan

[Thomas Kahle]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1493 bytes --]

On 03/19/2010 03:22 AM, François Bissey wrote:
>> Hi Sage-on-Gentoo team,
>>
>> This mail is informative, no action required. I just saw that you are
>> having gfan in your overlay. I also have it the science overlay. You
>> apply a patch (which I don't) with
>>
>>         # TODO: find out what this patch actually fixes
>>         epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${P}-fix-polynomial.patch
>>
>> I also know the author of the software a little. Let's join forces and
>> work on it in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293381
>>
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> So you put it in science overlay, I was wondering if I had done that a
> few month back and didn't remember ;)
> The patch comes from the sage sources.

Actually I wrote this ebuild from scratch because it is a dependency of
sci-mathematics/Macaulay2. If I remember correctly this is also in sage
somehow, right?

We also have all the dependencies + optional stuff for Macaulay2 in the
science overlay:

sci-m/polymake
sci-m/normaliz
sci-m/lattE-macchiato
sci-m/topcom
sci-m/4ti2
sci-m/frobby
sci-libs/libfac
sci-libs/factory
sci-libs/cdd+

All of these have corresponding bugs, let me know if some of them should
block sage.

regards,
Thomas



-- 
Thomas Kahle

The fundamental theorem of algebra is open source. Like any other
mathematical theorem it can be applied free of charge and everybody
has access to its proof and can convince himself how it works. Why
should software be any different?


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 380 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-science] gfan

[François Bissey]

> Actually I wrote this ebuild from scratch because it is a dependency of
> sci-mathematics/Macaulay2. If I remember correctly this is also in sage
> somehow, right?
> 
> We also have all the dependencies + optional stuff for Macaulay2 in the
> science overlay:
> 
> sci-m/polymake
> sci-m/normaliz
> sci-m/lattE-macchiato
> sci-m/topcom
> sci-m/4ti2
> sci-m/frobby
> sci-libs/libfac
> sci-libs/factory
> sci-libs/cdd+
> 
> All of these have corresponding bugs, let me know if some of them should
> block sage.
> 
Hi Thomas,

None of these blocks sage, although some are actually in the optional category
(not needed but can be added) so it is a good thing to have them around.

About the patch you can look here:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7820#comment:17
Unfortunately it is a bit short on details.

Francois