From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4X9a-0005WP-Jw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 09:23:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47C8BE0415; Thu, 14 May 2009 09:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbox.unige.ch (mbox.unige.ch [129.194.9.209]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD3BE0415 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 09:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Received: from deleron ([129.194.54.121]) by mbox.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPS id <0KJM004RGNECG2B0@mbox.unige.ch> for gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:23:00 +0200 (CEST) From: George Shapovalov To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-science] Re: Gentoo Science project status: updating project website Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:22:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <17e1a1290905131226i75476536t7bb473506ccaee4@mail.gmail.com> <200905141105.31841.george@gentoo.org> In-reply-to: <200905141105.31841.george@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-id: <200905141122.39939.george@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6d055e71-efbe-47f4-bc86-2856e90c3f90 X-Archives-Hash: 9014f5a7d22996abb5134429ef30ae9a I just realized, that while we have split into multiple subprojects to handle all the sci related stuff in Gentoo, our page did not follow this. There are only vague hints at subprojects in role fields of, like, two devs. It may be helpfull to branch the page a bit by adding pages for individual projects. I guess corresponding leads could be tasked with that ;). However I think this should not be obligatory. At the very least we should have a list of subprojects with the description of their "coverage area". Do we even have a 1:1 mapping between subprojects and herds at this point? To figure this out and get some idea of what is going on I started a subthread asking for headcount. I think it would be helpful if even people who are already listed on the page answer there. Please only include the structural info into those replies. Discussion of project page update should go under this thread. George