From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J4kZq-0001ha-Ul for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:06:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBIM4p8m023171; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:04:51 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBIM4oSW023148 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:04:51 GMT Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688E165389 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:04:48 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] emerge failed Message-ID: <20071218220448.GE24034@supernova> References: <4766BD88.6020200@j-schmitz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4766BD88.6020200@j-schmitz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 3bdf58d9-577d-4f87-9737-7974e2b9279e X-Archives-Hash: e78b7eda4de174cd6e3fd4e34c5df37b On 19:18 Mon 17 Dec , Justin wrote: > Hi all. > I tried to emerge coot-0.3.3 with new-interface which failed > (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202599). Now I recognised that > at my office computer, which is basically of the same software setup, > coot emerged with the 1.99 version of gtkglarea. > My question now is, how can I easily compare the systems (Useflags used, > packages emerged...) to figure out the difference. You can install portage-utils and run `qlist -I -U -v packagename` to show the versions and USE flags of various packages. Relevant ones would probably be coot, gtkglarea, maybe gtkglext. I'm not really sure why it would even be looking for gtkglarea with new-interface on, though, since that should only be for the old gtk-1 interface. Since that bug shows that a header wasn't found at /usr/include/gtkgl/gtkglarea.h, it might be worth checking whether that file exists. I've got some newer ebuilds around for 0.4 prereleases that I could add to the tree masked, if that would help. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list