From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GOCFC-0001Kf-2e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:52:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8FBq4DV020502; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:52:04 GMT Received: from platinum.cryos.net (platinum.cryos.net [195.242.214.61]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8FBq4vQ023152 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:52:04 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by platinum.cryos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B03BD73B for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:52:04 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cryos.net Received: from platinum.cryos.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (platinum.cryos.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZVutmlQDk9d4 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:52:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from ns0.cryos.net (ns0.cryos.net [217.155.144.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by platinum.cryos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F48834 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:52:01 +0100 (BST) From: "Marcus D. Hanwell" To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] website python error Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:51:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200609130935.29872.slug@aeminium.org> <200609141124.32255.cryos@gentoo.org> <450A2A6C.6050205@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <450A2A6C.6050205@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7382400.2jHZ2U67AV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609151252.01193.cryos@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 85e9608f-7682-4610-aa93-ea7b6675b091 X-Archives-Hash: a4d712638f0ce453b25dbb571605fc38 --nextPart7382400.2jHZ2U67AV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 15 September 2006 05:22, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > Not sure about the links from the overlays.g.o, gentooscience.org was > > created before the overlays think had even been discussed as a solution > > to a problem. It is advertised here, and on the IRC channel but it would > > be good to get it more widely advertised. > > Pretty sure they're not interested in linking to external overlays. If > you want a link, and to save some time on maintenance and future > breakage, it might be easier to just migrate to their hosting. > Like I said I set this up before overlays was available. I don't mind=20 performing the maintenance but if most would rather migrate then that is fi= ne=20 with me too. I don't think there is anything special about overlays.g.o but= =20 my time is becoming more limited anyway and so handing off administration=20 would not be a bad thing. I personally think trac adds little more than a source browser - the ticket= =20 system needs work to be more useful and I haven't had time to work out the= =20 niggles. It gets spammed regularly too. I notice they have turned it off=20 (which is what I was thinking of doing). To quote from their site 'You don't have to have an overlay at all, and if = you=20 do have one, you are absolutely free to host your own overlay somewhere els= e.=20 You don't have to host an overlay on o.g.o for it to be=20 considered "official".' If the general opinion is to move then please let m= e=20 know and I will contact someone from the project about migrating the overla= y. I really dislike how the authentication is not encrypted (or is it now?), b= ut=20 that may be just me and my opinions/levels of paranoia on the whole thing..= =2E=20 It appears you don't have to go on o.g.o to be "official" whatever that mea= ns=20 according to their own web page - see the bottom of=20 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/devguide.xml Give me opinions guys. I am not going to hold the overlay hostage but I wou= ld=20 rather it was moved for a real reason rather than this being the latest new= =20 shiny thing... I can place a full back up of the SVN repo online somewhere = if=20 you want to move it or have a copy... --nextPart7382400.2jHZ2U67AV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFCpPhzgRsaX1BF70RAmZbAKCE0hqzeZp2woy32H0fkNLSbgZaaACfcVzI HCIUuojFuFqQk9PQnayCQ/g= =WIoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7382400.2jHZ2U67AV-- -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list