From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E6qmC-0007ee-Nt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:26:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7LEPEuZ032515; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:25:14 GMT Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be (apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7LEPEx5028761 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:25:14 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 15A70381DF for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:25:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pbienst.dyndns.org (d51A54866.access.telenet.be [81.165.72.102]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06F03817A for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:25:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Bienstman To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:25:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200508211343.48047.pbienst@gentoo.org> <200508210922.09366.dd55@cornell.edu> In-Reply-To: <200508210922.09366.dd55@cornell.edu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart14420271.EX3vNIPBbQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200508211625.44864.pbienst@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cbc4e938-c9a8-46a7-bb39-99b27b5b3d9f X-Archives-Hash: 7e9288b06242345507e8c281fd952246 --nextPart14420271.EX3vNIPBbQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 21 August 2005 15:22, Darren Dale wrote: > I use numeric and scipy, and have been trying for a long time to improve > the ebuilds to use blas/lapack/atlas. I submitted an ebuild for numeric s= ix > months ago (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D81520), but it has > languished in buzilla because it is not clear how to deal with ATLAS (my > atlas USE flag was rejected). How should ATLAS dependencies be handled in > the new infrastructure? In theory it's as simple as depending on virtual/blas and virtual/lapack. T= he=20 user can then switch between different lapack and blas implementations at=20 runtime with blas-config and lapack-config. Cheers, Peter --nextPart14420271.EX3vNIPBbQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUAQwiO6DBK5bY6aANxAQJCjwQAkbIGIIl05tPuPysdXvgcPov+zeAQHMeD FWbooIRsRPMiuZEc95hDiLBKul+w4Iu8bFaGf8EmXXW1Mc27VVETGjiGnpadal1M NZBtLK7E5EOZdwvpGibtvl+0Aa75Yo0LA/jdxQvu5c+keoqz8xFn1yP5qQtzFJs1 CL0XrTfwKuc= =YvcT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart14420271.EX3vNIPBbQ-- -- gentoo-science@gentoo.org mailing list