* [gentoo-science] sage-6.2
@ 2014-05-30 16:57 Thomas Kahle
2014-05-30 19:52 ` François Bissey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Kahle @ 2014-05-30 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1176 bytes --]
Hi,
I'm trying sage-6.2 on my mostly stable amd64 system with sage's keyword
file. Portage can't resolve a conflict here and --backtrack=32 did not
do it either. Any ideas:
Cheers,
Thomas
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
dev-python/docutils:0
(dev-python/docutils-0.10::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
in by
>=dev-python/docutils-0.7[python_targets_python2_6(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_2(-)?,python_targets_python3_3(-)?,python_targets_pypy(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_2(-),-python_single_target_python3_3(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-)]
required by (dev-python/sphinx-1.1.3-r7::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
(dev-python/docutils-0.9.1-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
<dev-python/docutils-0.10[python_targets_python2_7(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]
required by (sci-mathematics/sage-doc-6.2::sage-on-gentoo, ebuild
scheduled for merge)
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 601 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sage-6.2
2014-05-30 16:57 [gentoo-science] sage-6.2 Thomas Kahle
@ 2014-05-30 19:52 ` François Bissey
2014-05-31 11:40 ` François Bissey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: François Bissey @ 2014-05-30 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Would you happen to have python 3.3 enabled? That would explain why
sphinx wants to pull a version of docutils 0.10. We currently have trouble
building sage-doc with docutils 0.10+ which is why it is blocked.
Francois
On 31/05/2014, at 4:57, Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying sage-6.2 on my mostly stable amd64 system with sage's keyword
> file. Portage can't resolve a conflict here and --backtrack=32 did not
> do it either. Any ideas:
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> dev-python/docutils:0
>
> (dev-python/docutils-0.10::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
> in by
>
>> =dev-python/docutils-0.7[python_targets_python2_6(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_2(-)?,python_targets_python3_3(-)?,python_targets_pypy(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_2(-),-python_single_target_python3_3(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-)]
> required by (dev-python/sphinx-1.1.3-r7::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>
> (dev-python/docutils-0.9.1-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>
> <dev-python/docutils-0.10[python_targets_python2_7(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]
> required by (sci-mathematics/sage-doc-6.2::sage-on-gentoo, ebuild
> scheduled for merge)
>
>
> --
> Thomas Kahle
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sage-6.2
2014-05-30 19:52 ` François Bissey
@ 2014-05-31 11:40 ` François Bissey
2014-06-01 21:02 ` Thomas Kahle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: François Bissey @ 2014-05-31 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Well only docutils-0.10 is rotten for sage-doc docutils-0.11 seems to be fine.
I made sure that it is an acceptable dependency in sage-doc but you’ll have to
keyword manually for now.
Francois
On 31/05/2014, at 7:52, François Bissey <frp.bissey@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would you happen to have python 3.3 enabled? That would explain why
> sphinx wants to pull a version of docutils 0.10. We currently have trouble
> building sage-doc with docutils 0.10+ which is why it is blocked.
>
>
> Francois
> On 31/05/2014, at 4:57, Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying sage-6.2 on my mostly stable amd64 system with sage's keyword
>> file. Portage can't resolve a conflict here and --backtrack=32 did not
>> do it either. Any ideas:
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
>> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>>
>> dev-python/docutils:0
>>
>> (dev-python/docutils-0.10::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
>> in by
>>
>>> =dev-python/docutils-0.7[python_targets_python2_6(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_2(-)?,python_targets_python3_3(-)?,python_targets_pypy(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_2(-),-python_single_target_python3_3(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-)]
>> required by (dev-python/sphinx-1.1.3-r7::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>>
>> (dev-python/docutils-0.9.1-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>>
>> <dev-python/docutils-0.10[python_targets_python2_7(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]
>> required by (sci-mathematics/sage-doc-6.2::sage-on-gentoo, ebuild
>> scheduled for merge)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Kahle
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] sage-6.2
2014-05-31 11:40 ` François Bissey
@ 2014-06-01 21:02 ` Thomas Kahle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Kahle @ 2014-06-01 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2042 bytes --]
Yes, that works.
Thanks,
Thomas
On 31/05/14 13:40, François Bissey wrote:
> Well only docutils-0.10 is rotten for sage-doc docutils-0.11 seems to be fine.
> I made sure that it is an acceptable dependency in sage-doc but you’ll have to
> keyword manually for now.
>
> Francois
>
> On 31/05/2014, at 7:52, François Bissey <frp.bissey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Would you happen to have python 3.3 enabled? That would explain why
>> sphinx wants to pull a version of docutils 0.10. We currently have trouble
>> building sage-doc with docutils 0.10+ which is why it is blocked.
>>
>>
>> Francois
>> On 31/05/2014, at 4:57, Thomas Kahle <tomka@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying sage-6.2 on my mostly stable amd64 system with sage's keyword
>>> file. Portage can't resolve a conflict here and --backtrack=32 did not
>>> do it either. Any ideas:
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
>>> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>>>
>>> dev-python/docutils:0
>>>
>>> (dev-python/docutils-0.10::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
>>> in by
>>>
>>>> =dev-python/docutils-0.7[python_targets_python2_6(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_2(-)?,python_targets_python3_3(-)?,python_targets_pypy(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_2(-),-python_single_target_python3_3(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-)]
>>> required by (dev-python/sphinx-1.1.3-r7::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>>>
>>> (dev-python/docutils-0.9.1-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>>>
>>> <dev-python/docutils-0.10[python_targets_python2_7(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]
>>> required by (sci-mathematics/sage-doc-6.2::sage-on-gentoo, ebuild
>>> scheduled for merge)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas Kahle
>>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 601 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-01 21:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-30 16:57 [gentoo-science] sage-6.2 Thomas Kahle
2014-05-30 19:52 ` François Bissey
2014-05-31 11:40 ` François Bissey
2014-06-01 21:02 ` Thomas Kahle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox