Re: [gentoo-science] Emerge Sage-doc-6.3 fails 3.16.5-sources gcc-4.8.3 with lto and graphite

["François Bissey" <frp.bissey@gmail.com>]

I think I have all the logs I can use at the moment. I want the output of the 
following two commands:
nm -D /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so | grep 
ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE

nm -D /usr/lib64/libpynac.so.1.1.0 | grep ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE

Actually make that 3 commands with the output of 
readelf -d /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so

Also to cross check that I am not missing anything fro your info output,
I cannot see "-ffat-lto-objects" anywhere in your compilation flags.
Is this correct?

Francois

On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:05:42 François Bissey wrote:
> Hum I am starting to wonder if there are things going on between lot and C++
> templates. More professional code may do ok but a lot of the stuff we have
> in sage may be a bit dubious. Can you send me the penal build log please
> and for good measure the one for sage. You can do it privately if you don’t
> want to post big file on the list.
> 
> I have been free of grading for almost 4 years. My wife is very happy about
> that.
> 
> François
> 
> > On 24/11/2014, at 17:12, Jeramia Poland <jeramia.poland@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Sorry for the delayed reply, I had a bunch of papers to grade. Yes, it is
> > installed. Attached are the lld results. Jeramia
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:20 AM, François Bissey <frp.bissey@gmail.com>
> > wrote: I hate automated spellchecking, I meant pynac not “penal” I
> > remember turning it off on an iPad after a ludicrous suggestion for
> > lapack.
> > 
> > François
> > 
> > > On 22/11/2014, at 15:33, François Bissey <frp.bissey@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >  I assume penal is installed otherwise
> > 
> > <lib_link_1.txt><lib_link_2.txt>