From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-science+bounces-1229-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P3Kho-00085F-SU
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:30:13 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C22FE0950;
	Wed,  6 Oct 2010 03:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx0.d.umn.edu (mx0.d.umn.edu [131.212.109.42])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69246E0950
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  6 Oct 2010 03:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mxr1.d.umn.edu (mxr1.d.umn.edu [131.212.109.92])
	by mx0.d.umn.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o963TfZm013613
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 22:29:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mxv2.d.umn.edu (mxv2.d.umn.edu [131.212.109.136])
	by mxr1.d.umn.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o963Tfgn014463
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 22:29:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from smtp.d.umn.edu (mx3.d.umn.edu [131.212.109.40])
	by mxv2.d.umn.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o963TfVT026773
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 22:29:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ledaig (ledaig.d.umn.edu [131.212.64.12])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by smtp.d.umn.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o963Siul024168
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 22:28:44 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:28:44 -0500
From: Steven Trogdon <strogdon@d.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sci-mathematics/maxima fails to build
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1286324661.21123.5@ledaig>
	<201010061608.59484.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To: <201010061608.59484.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz> (from
	f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz on Tue Oct  5 22:08:59 2010)
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.8
Message-Id: <1286335724.21123.6@ledaig>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-science+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-science.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="=-b8SmUzTaRrbypjUKmmf1"
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at mxv2.d.umn.edu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Archives-Salt: 47726792-4994-4728-89ae-0ebb141ad5ee
X-Archives-Hash: c1f6719ff23813ac11b8f8efe5bd5993

--=-b8SmUzTaRrbypjUKmmf1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On   10/05/10 - 22:08:59, Fran=E7ois Bissey wrote:
> > On   10/05/10 - 18:57:56, Fran=E7ois Bissey wrote:
> > > > Hi group!
> > > >
> > > > I've got some problems installing sci-mathematics/maxima in =20
> both my
> > >
> > > Funtoo
> > >
> > > > boxes.
> > > >
> > > > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/271383/
> > > >
> > > > The issue seems to be similar to :
> > > > http://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/issue/14, and =20
> the
> > > > work-around to redefining LDFLAGS works as well. However, =20
> something
> > >
> > > is
> > >
> > > > wrong with the way maxima deals with the LDFLAGS.
> > >
> > > OK I will have a look, it may be something I overlooked in my
> > > patches, it used
> > > to work here, so it may be caused by a slight change somewhere in =20
> the
> > > system
> > > since then.
> > >
> > > If you want maxima for sage you don't have to use the version =20
> located
> > > in the
> > > science overlay. It was a proof of concept for some patches. The
> > > version in
> > > portage will work just as well.
> > > 5.20.1-r2
> > > Francois
> >
> > For what it's worth, on my amd64 I'm unable to build the portage
> > maxima-5.20.1-r2 either with
> >
> > LDFLAGS=3D"-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed"
> >
> > There is the same
> >
> > make[1]: *** [binary-ecl/maxima] Error 1
> >
> > In fact ecls will not even configure with the indicated LDFLAGS.
> > Deleting "-Wl,--sort-common" allows ecls as well as maxima to be =20
> built.
> >
> OK I tested both:
> LDFLAGS=3D"-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" emerge -1v =20
> --nodeps maxima
> LDFLAGS=3D"-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" emerge -1v =20
> --nodeps ecls
> which build respectively maxima-5.20.1-r3 and ecls-10.4.1, on my x86 =20
> system
> and it merged fine.
> Does it work in your 32bits chroot Steve?
>=20
> Francois
>=20
Fran=E7ois,

Both of the above fail in my 32bit chroot. maxima will not build with =20
the same "binary-ecls/maxima" error and ecls will not pass the =20
configure step.

Steve

--=-b8SmUzTaRrbypjUKmmf1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkyr7OwACgkQSh5h5U6haiHJJACghvGIBAcsqpFNxecf8c/OEQCM
VysAnRN1O34A26yvQGmu2V5CKyN/GXea
=i1x5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-b8SmUzTaRrbypjUKmmf1--