On   10/05/10 - 22:08:59, François Bissey wrote:
> > On   10/05/10 - 18:57:56, François Bissey wrote:
> > > > Hi group!
> > > >
> > > > I've got some problems installing sci-mathematics/maxima in  
> both my
> > >
> > > Funtoo
> > >
> > > > boxes.
> > > >
> > > > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/271383/
> > > >
> > > > The issue seems to be similar to :
> > > > http://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/issue/14, and  
> the
> > > > work-around to redefining LDFLAGS works as well. However,  
> something
> > >
> > > is
> > >
> > > > wrong with the way maxima deals with the LDFLAGS.
> > >
> > > OK I will have a look, it may be something I overlooked in my
> > > patches, it used
> > > to work here, so it may be caused by a slight change somewhere in  
> the
> > > system
> > > since then.
> > >
> > > If you want maxima for sage you don't have to use the version  
> located
> > > in the
> > > science overlay. It was a proof of concept for some patches. The
> > > version in
> > > portage will work just as well.
> > > 5.20.1-r2
> > > Francois
> >
> > For what it's worth, on my amd64 I'm unable to build the portage
> > maxima-5.20.1-r2 either with
> >
> > LDFLAGS="-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed"
> >
> > There is the same
> >
> > make[1]: *** [binary-ecl/maxima] Error 1
> >
> > In fact ecls will not even configure with the indicated LDFLAGS.
> > Deleting "-Wl,--sort-common" allows ecls as well as maxima to be  
> built.
> >
> OK I tested both:
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" emerge -1v  
> --nodeps maxima
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" emerge -1v  
> --nodeps ecls
> which build respectively maxima-5.20.1-r3 and ecls-10.4.1, on my x86  
> system
> and it merged fine.
> Does it work in your 32bits chroot Steve?
> 
> Francois
> 
François,

Both of the above fail in my 32bit chroot. maxima will not build with  
the same "binary-ecls/maxima" error and ecls will not pass the  
configure step.

Steve