* [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64
@ 2010-05-13 20:42 Schwan, Christopher
2010-05-14 3:08 ` Steven Trogdon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Schwan, Christopher @ 2010-05-13 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Hi,
I just backported the fixes from sage-core-4.4.1 in src_prepare() to sage-core-4.3.5 and noticed now the same failures on amd64 as reported by Steven with sage-4.4 - so I have done something wrong in src_prepare(). I dont see the reason right now and will investigate on that later - maybe some of you see it.
Christopher
PS: Commited from PC with wrong time - dont be confused when looking at the history. I hope this doesnt break git
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64
2010-05-13 20:42 [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64 Schwan, Christopher
@ 2010-05-14 3:08 ` Steven Trogdon
2010-05-14 6:55 ` Christopher Schwan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Trogdon @ 2010-05-14 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1414 bytes --]
On 05/13/10 - 15:42:56, Schwan, Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just backported the fixes from sage-core-4.4.1 in src_prepare() to
> sage-core-4.3.5 and noticed now the same failures on amd64 as
> reported by Steven with sage-4.4 - so I have done something wrong in
> src_prepare(). I dont see the reason right now and will investigate
> on that later - maybe some of you see it.
>
> Christopher
>
> PS: Commited from PC with wrong time - dont be confused when looking
> at the history. I hope this doesnt break git
>
Christopher,
I backported to sage-core-4.3.5 here and I get none of the random exit
failures. I didn't run the entire test suite but enough of it where
random exit failures should appear. If I include the 4.3.5 networkx
patch I get the same first four failures I had previously with 4.3.5
and no random exit failures to that point. If I backport to 4.4.alpha0
then random exit failures do appear. I didn't backport everything, only
sage-core. I did a diff on the c_lib directory after unpacking
backports for 4.3.5 and 4.4.alpha0. The only differences appear in
c_lib/src/interrupt.c and are associated with message printouts when
there are errors. So I believe that libcsage.so and its headers are the
same for 4.4.alpha0 as for 4.3.5.
I just realized, and it's too late to try now, that I didn't check the
notebook.
Steve
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64
2010-05-14 3:08 ` Steven Trogdon
@ 2010-05-14 6:55 ` Christopher Schwan
2010-05-14 13:09 ` Steven Trogdon
2010-05-14 17:44 ` Steven Trogdon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Schwan @ 2010-05-14 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Hi Steven,
maybe I cheered too soon - could you please try to install sage-core-4.3.5-r1?
That is the version which failed for me if I did not do something wrong. I
also noticed that it took longer to trigger SIGABRT with this version.
In every case sage-4.3.5-r1 should be ready to get hg bisect working to find
out which commit could have caused this issue.
Christopher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64
2010-05-14 6:55 ` Christopher Schwan
@ 2010-05-14 13:09 ` Steven Trogdon
2010-05-14 17:44 ` Steven Trogdon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Trogdon @ 2010-05-14 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 721 bytes --]
On 05/14/10 01:55:21, Christopher Schwan wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> maybe I cheered too soon - could you please try to install
> sage-core-4.3.5-r1?
> That is the version which failed for me if I did not do something wrong. I
> also noticed that it took longer to trigger SIGABRT with this version.
>
> In every case sage-4.3.5-r1 should be ready to get hg bisect working to find
> out which commit could have caused this issue.
>
> Christopher
>
Christopher,
It was sage-core-4.3.5-r1 that I was using. I ran the tests overnight on a
laptop I have and there are no random exit failures. I don't see a newer
commit than yesterday. I will run the complete test on another machine today.
Steve
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64
2010-05-14 6:55 ` Christopher Schwan
2010-05-14 13:09 ` Steven Trogdon
@ 2010-05-14 17:44 ` Steven Trogdon
2010-05-15 10:34 ` Christopher Schwan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Trogdon @ 2010-05-14 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 677 bytes --]
On 05/14/10 - 01:55:21, Christopher Schwan wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> maybe I cheered too soon - could you please try to install
> sage-core-4.3.5-r1?
> That is the version which failed for me if I did not do something
> wrong. I
> also noticed that it took longer to trigger SIGABRT with this version.
>
OK, the test suite has completed on a second machine using
sage-core-4.3.5-r1 backported to 4.3.5. I get _no_ SIGABRT failures
here. I did notice that the order in which the tests are run depends on
the machine. I'm not sure how the ordering is decided but, perhaps, a
particular order is more inclined to produce SIGABRT failures?
Steve
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64
2010-05-14 17:44 ` Steven Trogdon
@ 2010-05-15 10:34 ` Christopher Schwan
2010-05-15 12:37 ` Christopher Schwan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Schwan @ 2010-05-15 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Hi Steven,
On Friday 14 May 2010 19:44:06 Steven Trogdon wrote:
> On 05/14/10 - 01:55:21, Christopher Schwan wrote:
> > Hi Steven,
> >
> > maybe I cheered too soon - could you please try to install
> > sage-core-4.3.5-r1?
> > That is the version which failed for me if I did not do something
> > wrong. I
> > also noticed that it took longer to trigger SIGABRT with this version.
>
> OK, the test suite has completed on a second machine using
> sage-core-4.3.5-r1 backported to 4.3.5. I get _no_ SIGABRT failures
> here. I did notice that the order in which the tests are run depends on
> the machine. I'm not sure how the ordering is decided but, perhaps, a
> particular order is more inclined to produce SIGABRT failures?
>
> Steve
On my amd64 it is still the same situation: I reinstalled sage-4.3.5-r1 and I
still get SIGABRT failures. Even worse, downgrading to sage-4.3.5 showed the
same failures, so I think the problem (additionally ?) lies somewhere in
Sage's dependencies ...
I am preparing a script which outputs a list of Sage's dependencies and their
versions so we can compare it.
Christopher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64
2010-05-15 10:34 ` Christopher Schwan
@ 2010-05-15 12:37 ` Christopher Schwan
2010-05-16 4:06 ` Steven Trogdon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Schwan @ 2010-05-15 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Hi,
On Saturday 15 May 2010 12:34:30 Christopher Schwan wrote:
> [..]
>
> I am preparing a script which outputs a list of Sage's dependencies and
> their versions so we can compare it.
>
> Christopher
please checkout the recent overlay and run:
./list-compare-deps sage sage-clib sage-core sage-data sage-extcode sage-
notebook sage-singular
in the Tools subdirectory of our repository. This should list the dependencies
of Sage compared with the version that are installed on your pc.
Christopher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64
2010-05-15 12:37 ` Christopher Schwan
@ 2010-05-16 4:06 ` Steven Trogdon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Trogdon @ 2010-05-16 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1010 bytes --]
On 05/15/10 07:37:53, Christopher Schwan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 15 May 2010 12:34:30 Christopher Schwan wrote:
>> [..]
>>
>> I am preparing a script which outputs a list of Sage's dependencies and
>> their versions so we can compare it.
>>
>> Christopher
>
> please checkout the recent overlay and run:
>
> ./list-compare-deps sage sage-clib sage-core sage-data sage-extcode sage-
> notebook sage-singular
>
> in the Tools subdirectory of our repository. This should list the
> dependencies
> of Sage compared with the version that are installed on your pc.
>
> Christopher
>
Christopher,
I hadn't masked things properly in backporting when using sage-core-4.3.5-r1
on my laptop. After fixing things and running the tests again I now have one
SIGABRT failure. I'm not sure if the fixes resulted in the failure or
something else triggered it. The only library change was ghmm. I've been
unable to get the test to fail when running it individually.
Steve
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-16 4:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-13 20:42 [gentoo-science] Sage: Random exit failures on amd64 Schwan, Christopher
2010-05-14 3:08 ` Steven Trogdon
2010-05-14 6:55 ` Christopher Schwan
2010-05-14 13:09 ` Steven Trogdon
2010-05-14 17:44 ` Steven Trogdon
2010-05-15 10:34 ` Christopher Schwan
2010-05-15 12:37 ` Christopher Schwan
2010-05-16 4:06 ` Steven Trogdon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox