Re: [gentoo-science] notebook backtrace

[Steven Trogdon <strogdon@d.umn.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1287 bytes --]

On   04/29/10 - 20:54:32, François Bissey wrote:
> > sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst"
> That particular one works for me. I am running the full test suite at
> the moment. I will probably run the tests on ppc over the week end
> as well, that may be interesting.
> 
> The only thing that jump at my mind for that test would be
> scipy. You should have 0.7.1 not 0.7.2 as there has been a change
> of interface, that would do that kind of things I think.
> But that's a shot in the dark and that wouldn't solve the first
> problem you reported.
> 
> Francois
> 
François,

Apparently in masking sage-4.4 to revert to 4.3.5 I had neglected to  
mask sage-doc-4.4. I had the wrong sage-doc installed for the test! In  
reverting to 4.3.5 other test failures were due to scipy as you  
indicate and others were due to matplotlib. I now have been able to  
reproduce test results I had previously for 4.3.5. Upon then upgrading  
to 4.4 I have _many_ failures of the "type" indicated in the first post  
of this thread; i.e. of the "type"

*** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/python2.6: corrupted double-linked list:

with an associated backtrace and memory dump. I suppose Christopher  
will observe the same on his amd64.

Steve


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]