From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O7edS-0003jg-H9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:03:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 703BFE078C; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx0.d.umn.edu (mx0.d.umn.edu [131.212.109.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C15E078C for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxr1.d.umn.edu (mxr1.d.umn.edu [131.212.109.92]) by mx0.d.umn.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3U109s9000809 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:00:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mxv2.d.umn.edu (mxv2.d.umn.edu [131.212.109.136]) by mxr1.d.umn.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3U109dv024742 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:00:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtp.d.umn.edu (mx3.d.umn.edu [131.212.109.40]) by mxv2.d.umn.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3U109YU024578 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:00:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ledaig (ledaig.d.umn.edu [131.212.64.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.d.umn.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3U0xa3v023353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:59:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:59:29 -0500 From: Steven Trogdon Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] notebook backtrace To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <201004301218.03990.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz> (from f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz on Thu Apr 29 19:18:03 2010) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.1 Message-Id: <1272589176.26964.0@ledaig> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="=-vAXgj240S2yoThY5aOwf" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at mxv2.d.umn.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Archives-Salt: 2787b8e4-6c18-417d-a937-ab6b7f661832 X-Archives-Hash: d9e711c96b96a8a6d38f802ad32cea83 --=-vAXgj240S2yoThY5aOwf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/29/10 - 19:18:03, Fran=E7ois Bissey wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone experienced the following after closing a worksheet and =20 > then > > the notebook? I believe I've seen something similar on another > > (sage-4.4) occasion unrelated to the notebook. > > > If you only saw that in sage, that could point to twisted-web2 which =20 > is a real > piece of garbage abandoned upstream but that sage-notebook doesn't =20 > want > to let go. If it is not related to the notebook at all, then that's a =20 > problem > that could creep into other non-sage apps in my opinion. > Did you use anything special in that worksheet? maxima, etc...? >=20 > Francois >=20 Hi Fran=E7ois, There was only plotting in the worksheet. I'm thinking it's something =20 other than the notebook. I ran the test suite on sage-4.4 and there are =20 lots of these backtrace dumps with /usr/bin/python2.6: corrupted double-linked list issues. I reverted back to 4.3.5 in an attempt to get "sane" test =20 results. I'm unable to get the same test results; although there are no =20 backtrace dumps! There has been several upgrades (flint, fplll, =20 sqlalchemy, maxima, ..., etc) since previous tests and, as much as =20 possible, I've reverted back to previous versions but still the tests =20 don't match. The first failing test (sage-4.3.5) that passed previously =20 is sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst" ********************************************************************** File "/opt/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst", line 358: sage: G.gens() Expected: (Dirichlet character modulo 20 of conductor 4 mapping 11 |--> -1, =20 17 |--> 1, Dirichlet character modulo 20 of conductor 5 mapping 11 |--> 1, 17 =20 |--> i) Got: ([-1, 1], [1, i]) ********************************************************************** I'd be interested in your 4.4 test results. Maybe there's something =20 I've missed. Steve --=-vAXgj240S2yoThY5aOwf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvaK3gACgkQSh5h5U6haiGdAACdGFwic4woQkoFPKcGI4GNv4HU Of0AnjRM2PHcUntMskHnQulIS4oZGwMA =pE5I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vAXgj240S2yoThY5aOwf--