From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-science+bounces-1877-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B1D138247
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:58:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D30B9E0B53;
	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:58:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailfilter2.tranzpeer.net (mailfilter-227.tranzpeer.net [202.180.66.227])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D09E0B52
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:58:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.slingshot.co.nz (webmailfe2.prv.callplus.co.nz [202.189.160.42])
	by mailfilter2.tranzpeer.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3885752D
	for <gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:58:52 +1300 (NZDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-science+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-science+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-science.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:58:52 +1300
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Bissey?= <fbissey@slingshot.co.nz>
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Build of cxvopt against acml not working
In-Reply-To: <52D46D66.10809@arcor.de>
References: <52D46D28.6070707@arcor.de> <52D46D66.10809@arcor.de>
Message-ID: <0c2a23e0b071c1041547c980f278478b@slingshot.co.nz>
X-Sender: fbissey@slingshot.co.nz
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,
	LOCAL_SLINGSHOT_TEST,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on spamsrv2
X-Archives-Salt: f5ea42fe-a6b4-40a9-9c3e-ae2368ab11c7
X-Archives-Hash: 2423994d2e6e813ea3b3027894eb6582

On 2014-01-14 11:49, Bastian Löffler wrote:
> Hi
> 
> ls -la /usr/lib64/ | grep libacml.so
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root       40 19. Mai 2013  libacml.so ->
> /opt/acml5.3.0/gfortran64/lib/libacml.so
> 
> It is from the science overlay it does not exist in the main tree:
>  emerge -av acml
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild   Rf   ] sci-libs/acml-5.3.1::science  USE="doc examples
> gfortran openmp -fma -ifort -int64 -open64 -pgi -static-libs {-test}" 0 
> kB
> 
> 
OK I just find it bizarre that there is a link in /usr/lib64, I don't 
have it installed
myself. So I am guessing
eselect blas list
will show acml as being selected and
eselect lapack list
will show the same.
Is
file /opt/acml5.3.0/gfortran64/lib/libacml.so
reporting a 64bit shared object as it should?
And finally what does
pkg-config lapack --libs
says?

Francois