[gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[Markus Hauschild]

Thanks to whomever removed the invite only flag

Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[John Alberts]

I also thought it was a little odd to have releng channel be invite
only, although I certainly understand the need to keep the spam to a
minimum.  I completely agree with the format they have used in the
past of having meetings being invite only during the beginning and
then opening up the channel at the end for the users to ask question
and give comments.

Regards,
John Alberts


On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Markus Hauschild
<hauschild.markus@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Thanks to whomever removed the invite only flag
>
>



-- 
John Alberts

Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[John Alberts]

Now, we can't even idle in releng to see what's going on in gentoo
release engineering land?  I thought all official gentoo irc channels
are supposed to be public except for the private core channel?


On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John Alberts <john.m.alberts@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also thought it was a little odd to have releng channel be invite
> only, although I certainly understand the need to keep the spam to a
> minimum.  I completely agree with the format they have used in the
> past of having meetings being invite only during the beginning and
> then opening up the channel at the end for the users to ask question
> and give comments.
>
> Regards,
> John Alberts
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Markus Hauschild
> <hauschild.markus@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks to whomever removed the invite only flag
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> John Alberts
>



-- 
John Alberts

Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[Tom Gall]

That's odd ... I'm still connected.

But I entirely agree with your comment. releng's channel shouldn't be private.

Regards,

Tom

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:00 AM, John Alberts <john.m.alberts@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now, we can't even idle in releng to see what's going on in gentoo
> release engineering land?  I thought all official gentoo irc channels
> are supposed to be public except for the private core channel?
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John Alberts <john.m.alberts@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I also thought it was a little odd to have releng channel be invite
>> only, although I certainly understand the need to keep the spam to a
>> minimum.  I completely agree with the format they have used in the
>> past of having meetings being invite only during the beginning and
>> then opening up the channel at the end for the users to ask question
>> and give comments.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John Alberts
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Markus Hauschild
>> <hauschild.markus@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks to whomever removed the invite only flag
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> John Alberts
>>
>
>
>
> --
> John Alberts
>
>

Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[gionnico]

Tom Gall wrote:
> That's odd ... I'm still connected.
> 
> But I entirely agree with your comment. releng's channel shouldn't be private.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tom
> 

If this is a voting, I agree it should be public - for example there's 
still a problem with 2008.0 media that prevents gentoo-x64 loading in 
certain machines (P35+Q6600?): we could have discussed it in there, also 
or I could listen.
 
 
 --
 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Scopri il Blog di Email.it: curiosità, tendenze, storie in diretta dal Web
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8135&d=29-7

Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[Andrew Gaffney]

gionnico wrote:
> Tom Gall wrote:
>> That's odd ... I'm still connected.
>>
>> But I entirely agree with your comment. releng's channel shouldn't be 
>> private.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tom
>>
> 
> If this is a voting, I agree it should be public - for example there's 
> still a problem with 2008.0 media that prevents gentoo-x64 loading in 
> certain machines (P35+Q6600?): we could have discussed it in there, also 
> or I could listen.

Please pay attention before spouting off at the mouth. It was only marked as +is 
for about 10 minutes. The channel is now mine and I've removed the restriction. 
Quit bitching about something that doesn't exist.

-- 
Andrew Gaffney                                 http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer             Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator

Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[John Alberts]

I'm sorry.  It didn't seem to me that it was temporary with the last
comments before I got kicked this morning:

09:49 <@wolf31o2> OK... this channel is now closed... what that means
is if you're not in release engineering
                  or a member of another team that works directly with
release engineering, you're getting
                  the boot
09:49 <@wolf31o2> sorry, guys
09:49 <@wolf31o2> but being banned by IP on Freenode because of
something that I supposedly said doesn't give
                  me much incentive to leave my conversations in public
09:50 <+agaffney> I was about to suggest making it +i like #-infra


In any case, I'm glad it's not private. :)

John Alberts



On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@gentoo.org> wrote:
> gionnico wrote:
>>
>> Tom Gall wrote:
>>>
>>> That's odd ... I'm still connected.
>>>
>>> But I entirely agree with your comment. releng's channel shouldn't be
>>> private.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>
>> If this is a voting, I agree it should be public - for example there's
>> still a problem with 2008.0 media that prevents gentoo-x64 loading in
>> certain machines (P35+Q6600?): we could have discussed it in there, also or
>> I could listen.
>
> Please pay attention before spouting off at the mouth. It was only marked as
> +is for about 10 minutes. The channel is now mine and I've removed the
> restriction. Quit bitching about something that doesn't exist.
>
> --
> Andrew Gaffney
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
> Gentoo Linux Developer             Catalyst/Installer + x86 release
> coordinator
>
>



-- 
John Alberts

Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[Ben de Groot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 241 bytes --]

John Alberts wrote:
> I'm sorry.  It didn't seem to me that it was temporary with the last
> comments before I got kicked this morning:

Yeah, that was unfortunate. Sorry about that, you're welcome back.

Ben
[RelEng PR liaison]



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: IRC Channel

[Ben de Groot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 304 bytes --]

John Alberts wrote:
> Now, we can't even idle in releng to see what's going on in gentoo
> release engineering land?  I thought all official gentoo irc channels
> are supposed to be public except for the private core channel?

You can. The provate status was only temporary and has been removed.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]