From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31502 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 00:10:28 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 00:10:28 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bnndl-0007wU-6f for arch-gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:10:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 7545 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jul 2004 00:10:20 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-releng-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12627 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 00:10:20 +0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rocky.richmond.edu: apache set sender to spyderous@gentoo.org using -f Message-ID: <51923.205.241.48.33.1090541415.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:10:15 -0400 (EDT) From: "Donnie Berkholz" To: In-Reply-To: <1090530730.3745.12.camel@marge.local.dertobi123.de> References: <20040718223502.GB23576@elvis.serverkompetenz.net> <10983.205.241.48.33.1090283394.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> <1090530730.3745.12.camel@marge.local.dertobi123.de> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Cc: X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.10) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MailScanner-SpamxCheck: , X-MailScanner-From: spyderous@gentoo.org X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Fwd: Re: [gentoo-doc] Re: [gentoo-releng] Documentation tarballs] X-Archives-Salt: caa252a4-47fb-4dd4-8ffd-db850cdaf77b X-Archives-Hash: b82495dafab32fb34fa92e688ba88ae3 Tobias Scherbaum said: > On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 02:29, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> It still doesn't work on 2.6 to my knowledge, however, so the >> kernel DRM must be used instead. > > Currently the docs state that "xfree-drm only works with a 2.4 kernel". > Would it be useful to add a note saying "with a 2.6 kernel use kernel > DRM"? Can't hurt. Might make a note that xfree-drm-4.3.0-r8 or greater is expected to work on 2.6. Also might want to say 2.6 and greater kernels rather than just 2.6 to make it 2.7 safe. -- gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list