From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EfZp9-0003BX-Ge
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:24:55 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAP9OiMq018044;
	Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:24:44 GMT
Received: from polito.it (anacreon.polito.it [130.192.3.82])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAP9OhtL016103
	for <gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:24:44 GMT
X-ExtScanner: Niversoft's FindAttachments (free)
Received: from [130.192.54.76] ([130.192.54.76] verified)
  by polito.it (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.1)
  with ESMTP id 29610630; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:24:43 +0100
Message-ID: <4386D860.1070801@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:24:48 +0100
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051028)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-releng+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-releng+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-releng+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-releng.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org, m.debruijne@hccnet.nl
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] oss in make.defaults for 2006.0?
References: <200511251014.11425.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200511251014.11425.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c4c3b8bb-0d8b-4a85-8534-a30bfd8b6bc7
X-Archives-Hash: cc14ac4fd2865fcabc940b293bca9805

Michiel de Bruijne wrote:
> Now that useflags are evaluated for the 2006.0 profile (e.g. nptl and apache2) 
> I wonder if it's still necessary to have oss in make.defaults? The 
> replacement (alsa) is preferred by kernel developers for almost 2 years. Time 
> to remove it from the 2006.0 profile?

I'd have a look at how many software are using oss only and how many 
have good alsa support, not to mention which drivers are oss only or 
work better as oss.

lu
-- 
gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list