[gentoo-releng] release plan

[gentoo-releng] release plan

[Jory A. Pratt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

    I most likely missed it but when are we  hoping to make 2005.1
production? Sorry for the ignorance here. I would also like to report
that I have tested x86/2005.1 for a full system install looks really
good other then python-fchksum error that shows up if CHOST is
changed. There is a bug report on this python-fscksum can be build
after python just a matter of changing the dep order which I am not
sure is possible or even fesible.
Just thought would sure some thoughts on the progress that has been
made toward the 2005.1 release.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC2ZnFGDfjNg8unQIRAk9wAJsH+zDMMjc6GxXP9+vvlC4bXqzaLQCfQwyv
H8E7gILxvMs+xgamYPvxT4c=
=eJWN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-releng] release plan

[Tim Yamin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 641 bytes --]

Jory A. Pratt wrote:
>     I most likely missed it but when are we  hoping to make 2005.1
> production? Sorry for the ignorance here.

Things are in progress. It'll be done when it's done <TM>.

 > I would also like to report
> that I have tested x86/2005.1 for a full system install looks really
> good other then python-fchksum error that shows up if CHOST is
> changed. There is a bug report on this python-fscksum can be build
> after python just a matter of changing the dep order which I am not
> sure is possible or even fesible.
> Just thought would sure some thoughts on the progress that has been
> made toward the 2005.1 release.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 544 bytes --]