From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30008 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2004 23:56:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Jul 2004 23:56:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BhGq6-0007lG-K2 for arch-gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2004 23:56:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 14398 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jul 2004 23:56:06 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-releng-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 11434 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2004 23:56:05 +0000 Message-ID: <40E89848.1060202@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 01:52:40 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org References: <550086E6-CE0C-11D8-9D85-0003938E7E46@gentoo.org> <20040704233118.GA26605@cerberus.oppresses.us> In-Reply-To: <20040704233118.GA26605@cerberus.oppresses.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at libero.it Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources X-Archives-Salt: 9a84541f-1778-4852-af03-8b6703519ac0 X-Archives-Hash: 465cfb9b2128281a35fe1c58588adaaa Jon Portnoy wrote: > ChangeLog is useful: > > 21 Jun 2004; Greg Kroah-Hartman > +gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7-r2.ebuild: > Removed 2710_amd76x-acpi.patch as it can be a standalone package > Removed 4720_gcloop-2.6-20040510.patch as it can be a standalone > package > (and the code style was horrible...) > I'd like to have those "coding style" issues pointed out, so I could fix them. I can agree that the current way I'm using to *building* it isn't really the sanest but as I stated many times: I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO KERNELIFY UCL and since ucl is giving good results even if I just took the compiled objects and I glue them in a kernel wrapper that was a good solution. I'm under exams and I can't reimplement ucl in kernel as happened for zlib. If the issue is really in the code (not the way it got linked) please tell me as soon as possible. Regards lu PS: Better comunication could avoid such _lack_ of style in Changelogs. -- Luca Barbato Developer Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list