From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22411 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 22:17:54 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 22:17:54 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BfnOl-0006gx-MH for arch-gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:17:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 15123 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jun 2004 22:17:46 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-releng-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27813 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 22:17:46 +0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rocky.richmond.edu: apache set sender to spyderous@gentoo.org using -f Message-ID: <25868.205.241.48.33.1088633853.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:17:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Donnie Berkholz" To: In-Reply-To: <1088605192.6402.160.camel@localhost> References: <1088527073.13773.4.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> <1088600249.13215.7.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> <1088600741.963.4.camel@sixthstreet.formanonline.com> <1088602394.24945.152.camel@localhost> <1088603473.18298.1.camel@localhost> <1088605192.6402.160.camel@localhost> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Cc: X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.10) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MailScanner-SpamxCheck: , X-MailScanner-From: spyderous@gentoo.org X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] samba on the livecds X-Archives-Salt: b8d7021e-8f6a-4a04-9cc9-60c890117ab4 X-Archives-Hash: 46f50dee97c8630fd0e004ccda481381 Chris Gianelloni said: > On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 09:51, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 09:33, Chris Gianelloni wrote: >> > Now, let's look at what it is linked against. This is on my work >> machine, so of course, USE flags will modify this list some, but the >> list is *quite* long here. > > As you can see, I did take USE into consideration. My point was really > just that samba can have quite a few dependencies, so we would want to > do something to control it. Heh, sorry. I had a few drinks in me at the time (had just gotten back from Five Points), and I must've forgotten what you wrote above. Speaking of, thought you were gonna come up to Columbia at some point. Donnie -- gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list