public inbox for gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michiel de Bruijne <m.debruijne@hccnet.nl>
To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] oss in make.defaults for 2006.0?
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:00:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511251100.20213.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4386D860.1070801@gentoo.org>

On Friday 25 November 2005 10:24, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Michiel de Bruijne wrote:
> > Now that useflags are evaluated for the 2006.0 profile (e.g. nptl and
> > apache2) I wonder if it's still necessary to have oss in make.defaults?
> > The replacement (alsa) is preferred by kernel developers for almost 2
> > years. Time to remove it from the 2006.0 profile?
>
> I'd have a look at how many software are using oss only and how many
> have good alsa support, not to mention which drivers are oss only or
> work better as oss.

For the programs that are oss-only a useflag shouldn't even exists, because 
it's not optional.
All systems I maintain (about 15 different hardware/software specs) have -oss 
and work as expected. I'm interested if someone on this list has 
hardware/software where oss is preferred over alsa?
Does anybody knows if the default setup of other distros include 
"oss-compiled" packages?
-- 
gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-25 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-25  9:14 [gentoo-releng] oss in make.defaults for 2006.0? Michiel de Bruijne
2005-11-25  9:24 ` Luca Barbato
2005-11-25 10:00   ` Michiel de Bruijne [this message]
2005-11-25 14:05     ` Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)
2005-11-25 14:21       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-26  8:32         ` Michiel de Bruijne
2005-11-26 23:28           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-27 22:32             ` Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200511251100.20213.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl \
    --to=m.debruijne@hccnet.nl \
    --cc=gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox