From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfZez-0006dJ-4X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:14:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAP9EEMa032584; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:14:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAP9EDVL020626 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:14:14 GMT Received: from basillia.speedxs.net ([83.98.255.13]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EfZen-00036n-87 for gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:14:13 +0000 Received: from debruijne.speedxs.nl (debruijne.speedxs.nl [83.98.237.219]) by basillia.speedxs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D4719011 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:59:04 +0100 (CET) From: Michiel de Bruijne To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-releng] oss in make.defaults for 2006.0? Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:14:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511251014.11425.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl> X-Archives-Salt: 27bff670-d9d3-47fd-ac5e-ccfd07c6eb60 X-Archives-Hash: 0aa988f681608bd92d26fbc5c15d2699 Now that useflags are evaluated for the 2006.0 profile (e.g. nptl and apache2) I wonder if it's still necessary to have oss in make.defaults? The replacement (alsa) is preferred by kernel developers for almost 2 years. Time to remove it from the 2006.0 profile? -- gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list