From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E29lm-0002hO-Hn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 15:42:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j78Fg0gW029615; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:42:00 GMT Received: from outmx005.isp.belgacom.be (outmx005.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.102]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j78FfxxW025293 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:42:00 GMT Received: from outmx005.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx005.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j78FgImK011773 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:42:18 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from fuji.siphos.be (mail.daewoo.be [81.247.252.5] (may be forged)) by outmx005.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j78FgGbJ011738 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:42:16 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by fuji.siphos.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53A62234DDC; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:42:53 +0200 From: Sven Vermeulen To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] alpha and x86 docs ready, rest still pending Message-ID: <20050808154253.GE21592@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org References: <20050808084641.GC11581@gentoo.org> <20050808111003.GP3733@celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de> <20050808131236.GA21592@gentoo.org> <20050808153031.GS3733@celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050808153031.GS3733@celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 37268fa4-0dd3-4e8e-8d84-c592569a7654 X-Archives-Hash: f71543020e46b769be343e070096945b --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 05:30:31PM +0200, Lars Weiler wrote: > I never understood wherefore GDP needs the information like > kernels and that all. If the arch-coordinator organised a > to have an up-to-date documentation, everything should be > fine. Because we have *two* handbooks, one for the networkless installations and one for the network based ones. The files we require are needed to verify if the networkless instructions work properly. If an architecture team tells me that the docs are fine, that is okay as well, as long as I get some notice about it. If you leave out the GDP in the release process, you'll eventually get into trouble where releases are made and the online docs are not ready yet.=20 > All in all it looks like that you must have missed a lot of > communication... Quite a lot, yes. Makes me wonder where that communication is happening. --=20 Documentation project leader - Gentoo Foundation Trustee The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>> --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC9319Xfqz7M26L9sRAlYUAJ9/Ek+fpHy6wH8jyzDwwaW7iqFZRgCfdM3M Y2rwSYBTD9qA4v8o0pCx82I= =ebRZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS-- -- gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list