From: Jason Huebel <jhuebel@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2004.0 Profile Deprecated
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:59:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408130959.35892.jhuebel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040813133922.GI1901@time.flatmonk.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1145 bytes --]
On Friday 13 August 2004 8:39 am, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > Maybe it would make more sense to have yearly refreshes of the
> > profiles, with profile "revisions" during the year using -r#.
>
> What's the point of the yearly refreshes?
Honestly, those yearly refreshes would be a duplication of effort. However,
if we use the year as the major number, it seems to me that the first release
for each year should include a refresh of the profile as well, just to track
with the year's releases. It's less duplication of effort than the current
flat-profile scheme, but still maintains an understandable progression.
There's no point in simplifying the versioning scheme if we're unwilling to do
any "cleanup maintenance". There is going to be some duplication, period.
But that duplication (minimized as much as possible) is what makes a
well-maintained set of profiles.
--
Jason Huebel
Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead
Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter
GPG Public Key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9BA9E230
"Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand."
Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-13 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200408111331.30552.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <pan.2004.08.12.09.17.55.915519@cox.net>
[not found] ` <200408121001.42258.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
2004-08-12 17:36 ` [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2004.0 Profile Deprecated Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-12 22:05 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-12 23:20 ` John Davis
2004-08-12 23:36 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 0:52 ` John Davis
2004-08-13 1:08 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 3:29 ` John Davis
[not found] ` <1092375494.17392.1.camel@sephora>
2004-08-13 14:20 ` John Davis
2004-08-13 14:49 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 13:39 ` Aron Griffis
2004-08-13 14:59 ` Jason Huebel [this message]
2004-08-13 18:58 ` William Hubbs
2004-08-13 19:08 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 21:22 ` William Hubbs
2004-08-15 1:19 ` John Davis
2004-08-16 15:10 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-19 15:59 ` John Davis
2004-08-19 17:16 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-19 18:10 ` Ned Ludd
2004-08-19 19:16 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-20 15:09 ` John Davis
2004-08-20 15:40 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-20 16:20 ` John Davis
2004-08-16 15:00 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-16 22:29 ` William Hubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408130959.35892.jhuebel@gentoo.org \
--to=jhuebel@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox